Article 15/11 of the blog italianimbecilli.blogspot.com
In the various places where there is presence of people, there is always someone that can even deny their conscience so as not to admit to himself that the anarchist ideal is adherent to his own thought, to ' I most sincerely. We say this with knowledge of the facts and experience. What we seem severe, since in this autorifiuto identifies a limitation of personal freedom. This is un'autocensura that hurts both the practitioner, both at the whole community.
There is this fear really, truly false, which makes people refractory to any speculation libertarian nature. These are people who have received information distorted on anarchy, and this information (taxes from those who do not want to take the individual consciousness) form a tough capsule that holds their conscience.
Discover the extraordinary effectiveness of anarchism to the problems of the individual and humanity is really easy, just read up - directly to original sources and not by what is said, to understand where the truth lies, and even where is the lie. phrases like "no man has received from nature the right to rule others" , Denis Diderot, is really hard to not share. In fact, the share intimately, but some feel a sense of revulsion knowing che ricalca l'ideale anarchico.
Si arriva ad assistere ad una contraddizione di coscienza, dove l'amore universale nei riguardi della fratellanza, predicato anche dalle persone paurose dell'anarchia, viene cortocircuitato o ignorato se quella stessa fratellanza viene predicata dagli anarchici. Sembra si voglia far finta di nulla e, in effetti, è proprio così, la reazione di queste persone, nel migliore dei casi, è quella dell'indifferenza. Di fronte alla scoperta del vero anarchismo (che non è caos e assenza di regole, non è neanche violenza), queste persone si scherniscono, adottano un atteggiamento di finta indifferenza. Perché finta? Perché la conoscenza non si può nascondere o ignorare. La conoscenza parla directly to the consciences and then we can say that these people are afraid of their own conscience . They are afraid to discover anarchist (man is born an anarchist, but do not know, ignore it or will it ignore).
So as not to admit to themselves the goodness of anarchy, another typical reaction of these people is to try desperately absurd pretexts, the most secret and non-existent loopholes or try-out impossible to disseminate the logical path of unlikely 'if' or 'but' . In other words: if the wall is white and it says, these people are trying rinneghino content that color. Absurd, but true. Likewise, when we anarchists explained by a linear logic and transparency in the violent state against the individual, the speaker starts to look scary reasons or evidence to show that we we're wrong (and there really puts it all). But these attempts are often clumsy, foolish, contradictory, do not serve to convince us to be wrong, rather than serve to convince themselves have no reason not to fall into the terrible jaws of their own conscience. It 's a method of self-deterrence, a way to defend against some kind of witchcraft or sorcery. As if to admit the validity of anarchist philosophy would be to condemn to eternal fire degl'inferi.
This is the result or effect of a propaganda di Stato che da almeno cento anni denigra gli anarchici proprio per la loro carica contagiosa di verità e di libertà, una propaganda continua che accusa gli anarchici in ogni frangente, li insulta, li condanna in ogni modo possibile, sì da far apparire l'anarchia qualcosa di pericoloso, di terribile. In effetti l'anarchia è sì pericolosa, ma non certo per gli individui che sono l'essenza dell'umanità, quell'umanità che gli anarchici vogliono difendere e liberare da ogni oppressore, al fine di liberare se stessi e la Natura.
Così al bambino viene insegnato che l'anarchia è violenza (quando invece l'anarchia odia la violenza), che senza regole non si vive (quando invece l'anarchia vive di regole-altre), disorder that is (if anything, is dis-order, understood as a subversion of the established, state, oppressive). Then the child grows up with the idea that the state is good and trouble in the future, let him find out the truth, the reactions could also be violent or as described so far. Lyrics and bloody revolt? Benvenga, but only those of the State (national anthem), but those who dare to cry out to the streets 'to arms' is being held up, if not condemned. Beyond the digression that serves as example, there is really to reflect on fear-induced towards anarchy.
The problem is that this fear to its own consciousness tends to alienate the individual, which does not feel free to explore other horizons (although he claims to be perfectly free), you feel intimidated and self-harm in spirit. These people, while complaining about many things wrong and suffered various abuses, are those who say to themselves: 'it is true, but I will not believe it', but without concluding anything, in fact hindering the process of liberation for all mankind .
What happens when you convince the fearful spot, even partially, of the goodness of the ideal anarchist? While continuing to defend themselves and not to accept that goodness, scary clings to what he has, what he considers a 'security' and wants us to do a scientific demonstration of anarchists, Proven, tested anarchy. Incidentally, it would be nice if all these systems were applied to real self-defense against the state, then yes there would be no need to explain anarchism (you, timid, try the flea who oppresses you, and even to yourself, Ask questions, demand tests). Sorry for the digression. Well, require proof of anarchy as it is applied by the State to claim the proof that the law is equal for everyone or that there is a real social justice. Whoever clings to these challenges, hoping to embarrass the anarchists, he falls ill. There are many who say "but anarchy is a utopia, can not be done" , imagining he had found in these due luoghi comuni una propria salvezza, un salvacondotto per rimanere nella propria prigione. Ma dobbiamo disilluderli. Anzitutto diciamo che l'anarchia si è compiuta in varie parti del mondo, quindi la prova c'è, si può fare, ma, a prescindere da queste prove, bisogna dire che l'anarchia è una condotta, una filosofia che nasce dall'uomo per sua stessa esigenza, e per il solo fatto che l'uomo riesca a pensarla, essa è realizzabile. "Quando è una sola persona a sognare, non è altro che un sogno. Ma quando molte persone sognano insieme, è l'inizio di una realtà" . (F. Hundertwasser)
Alcune citazioni di anarchici illustri
"Se il governo was really founded on the consent of the people, this government has no power to refuse such consent on the individual. " (W. Godwin)
" Governments live, for the most part, sull'ubriachezza of peoples, as they pretend to protect education, but their strength is based on ignorance: simulate to protect the freedom and the constitution, when the power is maintained for the lack of freedom. " (L. Tolstoy)
" The law does not has made the man even a little more fair. " (D. Thoreau)
" If we really had a meaning the word crime, no crime would be greater than what the company does col lasciar sussistere la miseria." (L. Molinari)
"La democrazia è menzogna, è oppressione, è in realtà oligarchia, cioè governo di pochi a benefizio di una classe privilegiata." (E. Malatesta)
"Il governo, la legge, la forza armata, mantengono il povero nella soggezione del ricco, l'operaio nella dipendenza del padrone." (M. Bakunin)
Altri aforismi
A chi non ha paura della propria coscienza e/o vuole scrollarsi di dosso un po' di luoghi comuni, consigliamo la lettura A come Anarchia (pdf). Nella colonna di destra ci sono altri banners informativi, tra cui anche program of the anarchist Errico Malatesta . Good
freedom to all.
0 comments:
Post a Comment