- dedicato alle vittime Palestinesi -
"Stones Of Arabia" di Rodolfo Siri
dall'album "Pulchra Manus" (2008)
http://www.lastfm.it/music/Rodolfo+Siri
Sunday, February 27, 2011
Why Japanese Women So Small
Rodolfo Siri - Stones Of Arabia
- dedicato alle vittime Palestinesi -
"Stones Of Arabia" di Rodolfo Siri
dall'album "Pulchra Manus" (2008)
http://www.lastfm.it/music/Rodolfo+Siri
- dedicato alle vittime Palestinesi -
"Stones Of Arabia" di Rodolfo Siri
dall'album "Pulchra Manus" (2008)
http://www.lastfm.it/music/Rodolfo+Siri
Friday, February 25, 2011
Is Yokohama Avid Trz A Good Tire
THE PORTAL 11 GATES, Karen Bishop
* (Stazione Celeste)
"Wings" by Karen Bishop
The Portal of the 11 gates
February 9, 2011
I wanted to send this brief message, because I thought it important at this moment without precedent. We are making good progress, entering a new reality in higher dimensional experience and the experiences that this generation will not worthless, because they can make us mad or be quite strange.
In 2011 we are going through this portal of the 11 gates, leaving many things behind. So, with the advent of every 11 months, and in general, in reference to the 11 gates, we are always being thrown forward with a little push, getting closer to our new space, until eventually we get there anyway.
Then, thanks to small increments of progress we are partly here and partly there and this is causing many to experience strange and disturbing to many of us. But, we also know that those strange feelings and experiences, I am going to describe are very common in the experience of ascension. Esse si verificarono abbondantemente intorno al 2000 e ora si stanno ripetendo. Questa prova evidente che ci stiamo davvero evolvendo in una nuovissima realtà ed esperienza, lasciandoci ben dietro le spalle gli ultimi tre anni, più o meno, è un segno incoraggiante.
Mentre noi siamo rimasti in uno stato di morte apparente per quasi tre anni, in attesa che coloro sul pianeta sostenessero la luce dentro di sé, in vece di riceverla dal cosmo, "dall´universo", o da altri che già possedevano la luce, molti che sono giunti qui in questo momento hanno finalmente dichiarato di aver terminato il lavoro di assistere nel piano e volevano essere liberi. Si è deciso, allora, che, finalmente, saremmo andati avanti, indipendentemente from what was happening, because the game's resistance lasted so long that many were limited to live or, at best, were beginning to suffer damage and be exhausted beyond measure.
Then, during the last weeks and the last months, we went ahead and we're releasing, though with little progress. During recent years, we were in the birth canal, or tunnel, if you want, and when you are in that space is practically impossible to "see" anything. In addition, we are not even connected to anything. Alone in the tunnel, or on a raft floating on a sea without wind behind him, without rowing, flat water, with no one on the right or left. But now we are going forward and this causes the strange sensation of being in two places at once.
We may feel totally out of my head, as if we were not here at all. We have the impression of speaking, but it is not in our body ... as if the words came from someone else ... certainly not us. Maybe look at the mirror, wondering who is that person, since we have no idea of \u200b\u200bwho we are or where we are because we are not all here now.
We may have difficulty interacting with others, either because they are all here! We may feel lost in an unfamiliar area, very alone and connected to nothing. Maybe we do not remember the meaning of anything and can not remember the name common objects (very common in transition!). We have some particularly difficult times to finish a sentence, because we lose the thread. Sometimes, when I was writing my new book, I began a thought or a sentence and then I lost it somewhere and I needed a century to take up the thread ... I could not find it anywhere ... seemed to vanish from my space. We might even forget our name or our birthdate, this is very common.
In general, we do not feel as if we were all here. Thus, one might ask if we're coming Alzheimer's, because the symptoms are very similar. But, unlike Alzheimer's, all of these symptoms over time pass, as soon as we are completely enveloped by our new space, in a higher dimension.
Physical symptoms include the old and family need to eat every two hours, with a sudden drop in sugar. Our bodies are honing the line with that new reality by making a massive transition and need all the fuel you can. We may feel weak and exhausted and have little power to use at any given time. As we enter the new, we may be enthusiastic about new ideas and creations and then have no fuel or energy required to implement them on time, and even then it passes, for a while '. We are still very tired from this whole process and the way in which it took place. You need a solid recovery period and I hope that we will receive this precious gift in the future.
We feel that we are living in a world of experience, and then suddenly we find ourselves in another world or reality and we have to do somersaults, jump back and forth through a wide open, huge and empty space , ritrovandoci confused, delirious, exhausted and divided in half. But there are also events in physical reality, which are consistent with being in two worlds.
We may be in the early stages of something new and exciting, but still not be able to leave everything behind. Thus, we might want to start Our new, but with the need to fix the wires pending before, or to complete the last vestiges of our old reality, before you can continue by all means. In some ways, we could have started again, but even still be in the old, living in both spaces, thus creating even more confusion and division. Or, we might have new opportunities and new messages that arrive to us, and do not reach them before they end up the old man.
During this transition period, we might have the impression of drowning, drowning in possible financial disasters and we wonder how we survived. But as always in the ascension, our needs are always met e, in particolare durante questo momento, abbiamo appena quello che ci occorre per sostenerci, ma questo non necessariamente produce nuovo supporto finanziario, perché durante gli ultimi tre anni abbiamo dovuto vivere della nostra energia personale. Quindi, anche se le nostre necessità vengono soddisfatte, veniamo accuditi, anche se, al momento, attraverso i nostri sforzi personali. Siamo tenuti d´occhio e monitorati dall´alto e, quando serve maggior sostegno, esso in qualche modo, miracolosamente, arriverà, fin quando saremo stabilmente sistemati (a questo proposito, un sentito ringraziamento a coloro tra voi che ultimamente mi hanno inviato delle donazioni...sono state molto apprezzate ed erano necessario. Grazie mille)
Mentre we move further into our new reality, leaving behind the old, even if just small steps and constantly received a big boost and a much larger movement, with the advent of the equinox in March. During this period we will be immersed more firmly in our new spaces ... spaces that now fit much better than us ... because we have forsaken that which suits us more. So, when the equinox through the big push will come and the great light, they will serve to support us in more ways than we imagine. There also will push strongly in a large space with a new light, with something to cling to, with much more abundance for us all. One thing that we see from very long time.
I wish you heaven in your heart, starlight in the soul and miracles in life in these miraculous times,
Karen Bishop
(not currently have a website or internet or e-mail, but you can also reach me by post: PO Box 15196, Rio Rancho, New Mexico 87174 
* (Stazione Celeste)
"Wings" by Karen Bishop
The Portal of the 11 gates
February 9, 2011
I wanted to send this brief message, because I thought it important at this moment without precedent. We are making good progress, entering a new reality in higher dimensional experience and the experiences that this generation will not worthless, because they can make us mad or be quite strange.
In 2011 we are going through this portal of the 11 gates, leaving many things behind. So, with the advent of every 11 months, and in general, in reference to the 11 gates, we are always being thrown forward with a little push, getting closer to our new space, until eventually we get there anyway.
Then, thanks to small increments of progress we are partly here and partly there and this is causing many to experience strange and disturbing to many of us. But, we also know that those strange feelings and experiences, I am going to describe are very common in the experience of ascension. Esse si verificarono abbondantemente intorno al 2000 e ora si stanno ripetendo. Questa prova evidente che ci stiamo davvero evolvendo in una nuovissima realtà ed esperienza, lasciandoci ben dietro le spalle gli ultimi tre anni, più o meno, è un segno incoraggiante.
Mentre noi siamo rimasti in uno stato di morte apparente per quasi tre anni, in attesa che coloro sul pianeta sostenessero la luce dentro di sé, in vece di riceverla dal cosmo, "dall´universo", o da altri che già possedevano la luce, molti che sono giunti qui in questo momento hanno finalmente dichiarato di aver terminato il lavoro di assistere nel piano e volevano essere liberi. Si è deciso, allora, che, finalmente, saremmo andati avanti, indipendentemente from what was happening, because the game's resistance lasted so long that many were limited to live or, at best, were beginning to suffer damage and be exhausted beyond measure.
Then, during the last weeks and the last months, we went ahead and we're releasing, though with little progress. During recent years, we were in the birth canal, or tunnel, if you want, and when you are in that space is practically impossible to "see" anything. In addition, we are not even connected to anything. Alone in the tunnel, or on a raft floating on a sea without wind behind him, without rowing, flat water, with no one on the right or left. But now we are going forward and this causes the strange sensation of being in two places at once.
We may feel totally out of my head, as if we were not here at all. We have the impression of speaking, but it is not in our body ... as if the words came from someone else ... certainly not us. Maybe look at the mirror, wondering who is that person, since we have no idea of \u200b\u200bwho we are or where we are because we are not all here now.
We may have difficulty interacting with others, either because they are all here! We may feel lost in an unfamiliar area, very alone and connected to nothing. Maybe we do not remember the meaning of anything and can not remember the name common objects (very common in transition!). We have some particularly difficult times to finish a sentence, because we lose the thread. Sometimes, when I was writing my new book, I began a thought or a sentence and then I lost it somewhere and I needed a century to take up the thread ... I could not find it anywhere ... seemed to vanish from my space. We might even forget our name or our birthdate, this is very common.
In general, we do not feel as if we were all here. Thus, one might ask if we're coming Alzheimer's, because the symptoms are very similar. But, unlike Alzheimer's, all of these symptoms over time pass, as soon as we are completely enveloped by our new space, in a higher dimension.
Physical symptoms include the old and family need to eat every two hours, with a sudden drop in sugar. Our bodies are honing the line with that new reality by making a massive transition and need all the fuel you can. We may feel weak and exhausted and have little power to use at any given time. As we enter the new, we may be enthusiastic about new ideas and creations and then have no fuel or energy required to implement them on time, and even then it passes, for a while '. We are still very tired from this whole process and the way in which it took place. You need a solid recovery period and I hope that we will receive this precious gift in the future.
We feel that we are living in a world of experience, and then suddenly we find ourselves in another world or reality and we have to do somersaults, jump back and forth through a wide open, huge and empty space , ritrovandoci confused, delirious, exhausted and divided in half. But there are also events in physical reality, which are consistent with being in two worlds.
We may be in the early stages of something new and exciting, but still not be able to leave everything behind. Thus, we might want to start Our new, but with the need to fix the wires pending before, or to complete the last vestiges of our old reality, before you can continue by all means. In some ways, we could have started again, but even still be in the old, living in both spaces, thus creating even more confusion and division. Or, we might have new opportunities and new messages that arrive to us, and do not reach them before they end up the old man.
During this transition period, we might have the impression of drowning, drowning in possible financial disasters and we wonder how we survived. But as always in the ascension, our needs are always met e, in particolare durante questo momento, abbiamo appena quello che ci occorre per sostenerci, ma questo non necessariamente produce nuovo supporto finanziario, perché durante gli ultimi tre anni abbiamo dovuto vivere della nostra energia personale. Quindi, anche se le nostre necessità vengono soddisfatte, veniamo accuditi, anche se, al momento, attraverso i nostri sforzi personali. Siamo tenuti d´occhio e monitorati dall´alto e, quando serve maggior sostegno, esso in qualche modo, miracolosamente, arriverà, fin quando saremo stabilmente sistemati (a questo proposito, un sentito ringraziamento a coloro tra voi che ultimamente mi hanno inviato delle donazioni...sono state molto apprezzate ed erano necessario. Grazie mille)
Mentre we move further into our new reality, leaving behind the old, even if just small steps and constantly received a big boost and a much larger movement, with the advent of the equinox in March. During this period we will be immersed more firmly in our new spaces ... spaces that now fit much better than us ... because we have forsaken that which suits us more. So, when the equinox through the big push will come and the great light, they will serve to support us in more ways than we imagine. There also will push strongly in a large space with a new light, with something to cling to, with much more abundance for us all. One thing that we see from very long time.
I wish you heaven in your heart, starlight in the soul and miracles in life in these miraculous times,
Karen Bishop
(not currently have a website or internet or e-mail, but you can also reach me by post: PO Box 15196, Rio Rancho, New Mexico 87174
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Toronto Gay Online Cruising
I Want To Grow Old
Fearless,
a beetle flies,
encounter what appears
in his eyes, a sun
full of happiness.
DB 
Fearless,
a beetle flies,
encounter what appears
in his eyes, a sun
full of happiness.
DB
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Why Is It Important To Watch Calorie Intake
MESSAGE FROM THE ANGELS OF LOVE
BEINGS OF LIGHT
channeled by Barbara Ziletti
22/02/2011
MESSAGE FROM ANGELS
Barbara Ziletti
beautiful soul, light and bright, welcome today in this sweet reading.
Each of you will be touched in the depths of their hearts to us Angels, Beings of Light.
is true that you humans are the architects of your destiny, it is true that nothing we can because we are not given permission to interfere, it is true that only you can choose, decide, plan, change the cards in play at any moment ... But
Angels is also true that we support you from up here. There is given power to act on your behalf because it would be an act of violence on your earthly experience.
You are beings of light as we are, but you are on Earth in human form to experience all that you have decided.
You are still able to change things at all times, is not true that your destiny is definitive, subendolo passively.
Before you decided to incarnate as experience carrying out, in broad terms, but as the time-space mutable, you are offered may change at any moment.
is then passively suffer from an event you have been working, trying to get the best possible result.
The key word is DO NOT EVER GIVE UP!
Follow the example of your children, indigo children, crystal and rainbow ... after having suffered for a long time we are showing that surrender leads them to achieve unimaginable! Not mean giving up continuing in spite of everything and everyone, even though everything seems to be in mani di pochi “eletti” che altro non sono che persone che si sono prese il potere e che ora lo devono restituire con gli interessi (vedi cosa sta accadendo nel mondo…).
Anche nel vostro quotidiano siete invitati a lottare, a combattere per i vostri principi, ad imporvi, a farvi valere… ma l’unica arma che dovete usare è L’AMORE.
In questo modo il vostro “nemico” si troverà spiazzato e toccando il suo cuore toccherete anche il vostro e verrete elevati ad un livello superiore nel quale non saranno più necessarie esperienze dolorose.
Iniziate già da subito ad assaporare…
Se vi sentite stanchi, apatici, depressi, malati, non temete, è giunta l’ora di uscire da questa gabbia che voi stessi avete creato, ora siete pronti per uscire ed affrontare la vita!
Osate realizzare ciò che avete tenuto nel cassetto per molto tempo, di qualsiasi cosa si tratti… quella cosa siete voi!amate ciò che fate e amate ancora di più ciò che non vi piace, perché dovete solo cambiare il punto di osservazione.
Quando vi svegliate al mattino immaginate che sia un giorno nuovo nel quale vi vengono offerte nuove opportunità, nuove consapevolezze, nuovi doni.
Oggi è già ora di cominciare a realizzare voi stessi.
È inutile attribuire colpe a destra e a manca, è ora di agire e voi siete pronti, altrimenti non sareste mai giunti a questa lettura.
Molti you wonder how they can make contact with your guide ...
Everyone has a personal way, we say only to sharpen perceptions, follow the synchronicity because you think the message we send there every day, but do not focus on the way but content.
could be a song, a phrase, a person, animal, examples could go on forever.
not seek personal dialogue between you and your guide, but rather be content to grasp the meaning of what she wants to send your guide.
Even Jesus told the apostles to believe him because in him there was the Father ...
There are many groups at this time and despite everything ... there is much dispersion
not attribute too much power in too few people, otherwise you could fall into the trap of the "power given to few."
Each of you can, everyone is a master, each of you can, stop to delegate to others ... you are all the same!
You just have to rediscover this great power within you and share.
Remember that every time you see a double issue, is our message, we say simply, "you are not alone !!!".
double numbers are a clear example of the fact that more and more people are able to perceive them because many people are noticing them, whereas before they passed unnoticed.
This is just one example of our event.
Each Guardian Angel is next to each of you, without exception, and you have a duty to accept and not deny it because it's like a disowned part of yourself.
You are not alone, do not you ever been ... even when in the darkest moments of despair and I think I am, we were beside you.
Open your hearts and think that we in the Angelic Kingdom, there are always close, but not attribuiteci too much power because the power is in every one of you, no one has more than another, it's just that some are others are not aware, some not.
We love you immensely!
MESSAGE FROM ANGELS
Barbara Ziletti
beautiful soul, light and bright, welcome today in this sweet reading.
Each of you will be touched in the depths of their hearts to us Angels, Beings of Light.
is true that you humans are the architects of your destiny, it is true that nothing we can because we are not given permission to interfere, it is true that only you can choose, decide, plan, change the cards in play at any moment ... But
Angels is also true that we support you from up here. There is given power to act on your behalf because it would be an act of violence on your earthly experience.
You are beings of light as we are, but you are on Earth in human form to experience all that you have decided.
You are still able to change things at all times, is not true that your destiny is definitive, subendolo passively.
Before you decided to incarnate as experience carrying out, in broad terms, but as the time-space mutable, you are offered may change at any moment.
is then passively suffer from an event you have been working, trying to get the best possible result.
The key word is DO NOT EVER GIVE UP!
Follow the example of your children, indigo children, crystal and rainbow ... after having suffered for a long time we are showing that surrender leads them to achieve unimaginable! Not mean giving up continuing in spite of everything and everyone, even though everything seems to be in mani di pochi “eletti” che altro non sono che persone che si sono prese il potere e che ora lo devono restituire con gli interessi (vedi cosa sta accadendo nel mondo…).
Anche nel vostro quotidiano siete invitati a lottare, a combattere per i vostri principi, ad imporvi, a farvi valere… ma l’unica arma che dovete usare è L’AMORE.
In questo modo il vostro “nemico” si troverà spiazzato e toccando il suo cuore toccherete anche il vostro e verrete elevati ad un livello superiore nel quale non saranno più necessarie esperienze dolorose.
Iniziate già da subito ad assaporare…
Se vi sentite stanchi, apatici, depressi, malati, non temete, è giunta l’ora di uscire da questa gabbia che voi stessi avete creato, ora siete pronti per uscire ed affrontare la vita!
Osate realizzare ciò che avete tenuto nel cassetto per molto tempo, di qualsiasi cosa si tratti… quella cosa siete voi!amate ciò che fate e amate ancora di più ciò che non vi piace, perché dovete solo cambiare il punto di osservazione.
Quando vi svegliate al mattino immaginate che sia un giorno nuovo nel quale vi vengono offerte nuove opportunità, nuove consapevolezze, nuovi doni.
Oggi è già ora di cominciare a realizzare voi stessi.
È inutile attribuire colpe a destra e a manca, è ora di agire e voi siete pronti, altrimenti non sareste mai giunti a questa lettura.
Molti you wonder how they can make contact with your guide ...
Everyone has a personal way, we say only to sharpen perceptions, follow the synchronicity because you think the message we send there every day, but do not focus on the way but content.
could be a song, a phrase, a person, animal, examples could go on forever.
not seek personal dialogue between you and your guide, but rather be content to grasp the meaning of what she wants to send your guide.
Even Jesus told the apostles to believe him because in him there was the Father ...
There are many groups at this time and despite everything ... there is much dispersion
not attribute too much power in too few people, otherwise you could fall into the trap of the "power given to few."
Each of you can, everyone is a master, each of you can, stop to delegate to others ... you are all the same!
You just have to rediscover this great power within you and share.
Remember that every time you see a double issue, is our message, we say simply, "you are not alone !!!".
double numbers are a clear example of the fact that more and more people are able to perceive them because many people are noticing them, whereas before they passed unnoticed.
This is just one example of our event.
Each Guardian Angel is next to each of you, without exception, and you have a duty to accept and not deny it because it's like a disowned part of yourself.
You are not alone, do not you ever been ... even when in the darkest moments of despair and I think I am, we were beside you.
Open your hearts and think that we in the Angelic Kingdom, there are always close, but not attribuiteci too much power because the power is in every one of you, no one has more than another, it's just that some are others are not aware, some not.
We love you immensely!
BEINGS OF LIGHT
channeled by Barbara Ziletti
Where To Find Gold By Satellite Images
's just a matter of time ... Nameless
The refrain is waning, notes slower and slower, until you reach the silence.
A heavy silence, because of misconduct.
Missing words, missing persons and their laughter.
Yet, here I am in the middle of the road, but there is nothing, if not the night and asphalt.
Cigarette smoking, burning throat.
Some speak of the value of silence, a tremendous value.
But when it can not be more of this sea flat and calm?
When you need a storm, a gust of wind?
Today, I need a safe haven. Give me a
sea.
I want to be there, watching the world go by.
feel part of it, to feel part of the world, who do not know. A
smell the salt.
The carillon is now stopped.
There is nothing, to talk about. Only
of silence ... 
The refrain is waning, notes slower and slower, until you reach the silence.
A heavy silence, because of misconduct.
Missing words, missing persons and their laughter.
Yet, here I am in the middle of the road, but there is nothing, if not the night and asphalt.
Cigarette smoking, burning throat.
Some speak of the value of silence, a tremendous value.
But when it can not be more of this sea flat and calm?
When you need a storm, a gust of wind?
Today, I need a safe haven. Give me a
sea.
I want to be there, watching the world go by.
feel part of it, to feel part of the world, who do not know. A
smell the salt.
The carillon is now stopped.
There is nothing, to talk about. Only
of silence ...
Friday, February 18, 2011
Black And White Wording
Amore e libertà - Osho
Let there be space ...
In "Prophet" by Kahlil Gibran, Almustafa says Let there be spaces in your togetherness, and between you dance to the winds of heaven.
Love one another but make not a bond of love: Let it rather be a moving sea between the shores of your souls.
If your being together is not the result of lust, your love will go deeper and deeper with the passage of time. Lust flattens everything, since biology does not care that you stay together or not. His only interest is reproduction, for which love is not necessary: \u200b\u200byou can continue to produce children without love.
I looked all sorts of animals. I lived in the forests, mountains, and I've always been perplexed when the animals make love always seem very sad.
I've never seen one animal to make love with joy, it seems that some unknown force requires them to do so. It is not the result of their choice, not their freedom but their slavery. This makes them sad.
I have seen the same thing in humans. Have you ever seen a husband and wife in the street? Maybe you do not know if two people are husband and wife, but if both have a sad face can be some who are married!
When traveling by train from Delhi to Srinagar and in my compartment was just another empty seat. He arrived a couple of young people: a man and a woman beautiful. Since both could not sit in the only empty seat, he went into another compartment. But at each station is presented with sweets, fruit, flowers.
I watched that show ... I'm not just a mere observer ... at one point I asked the woman what they were married, and she said: "For about seven years."
I said, "Do not lie! You can not fool anyone but me ... you are not married. "
was shocked. A stranger, with whom he had never spoken ... that it only had to look at, and I wondered how I had understood.
I said: "It is a great discovery, it is something basic. If it were your husband, you'd be lucky if, once gone, reappear at the station of arrival. "
He said: "I do not know, nor do I know you. But what you say is true. He's my lover, a friend of my husband. "
commented: "In this case everything is clear."
What goes wrong between husbands and wives, even after a marriage of love? The fact is that this is not love, and all have accepted it, as if they knew what love is: it is pure and simple lust. Soon you'll be tired of each other. Biology has deceived you to fulfill their biological program, aimed at procreation, and in a matter of not finding anything new: the same face, the same geography, the same topography. How many times have you explored? Because of the marriage the whole world lives in sorrow, yet all are still unaware of the case.
Love is one of the most mysterious phenomena that exist. And it is love that Almustafa are talking about: if it is not lust you can not get bored.
Almustafa says Let there be spaces in your togetherness.
're together, but do not try to dominate you, do not try to have them and not destroy the individuality of others.
Unfortunately, it is what is done everywhere. Why should a woman take the man's name? It has its own name, has its own individuality. Think of a man who takes the name of the woman no man will ever do.
Why she should go home to live with man? Why should not he be the man to live in the house of the woman?
Sometimes it happens that a man marries a condition to go home to live with his wife, because her parents are elderly and have no other children to take care of them. But have you noticed? When a man goes to live in the house of his wife, is blamed by all. Is mocked, as if he had lost his manhood ... while no one laughs at the woman.
My advice is this: when a man and a woman decide to live together, each should have his own house. No one should go to the house of the other, because the very moment someone goes home to someone else inevitably becomes a slave, and slaves can not be happy. They have lost their integrity, their individuality. They sold themselves.
If you live together, that there is room left ... if the husband comes home late, no need for the wife questioned him about where he was, sul perché è in ritardo. Egli ha diritto alla propria libertà, è un individuo libero. Siete due individui che vivono insieme e nessuno invade lo spazio dell’altro. Se la moglie torna tardi, non è necessario chiederle dove è stata. Chi sei per farlo? Lei ha la propria libertà, il proprio spazio.
Purtroppo questo accade ogni giorno, in tutte le case: la gente litiga per inezie, ma in profondità l’elemento della discordia è che nessuno è pronto a lasciare che l’altro abbia il proprio spazio, la propria libertà.
Le cose che piacciono possono essere diverse. A tuo marito può piacere qualcosa, a te qualcos’altro. Questo non vuol dire che dobbiate iniziare a litigare perché, as a husband and wife should have the same preferences.
And then, all these questions ... every husband, when he returned home, ruminating in his mind the same questions: "What do I ask? How to respond? ". And she already knows what to ask and what her husband will answer, and he knows all those answers are false, fabricated. The husband is cheating ...
What love is this: always suspicious, always afraid, victim of some jealousy? If your wife sees you with another woman - even if you're just laughing and talking - is enough to fight all night. And you regret your choice: this is too ... just for a little rice 'with someone else! And if the husband sees his wife with another man and she is more happy, more happy, it is sufficient to create unrest, turmoil in his soul.
People are unaware that absolutely does not know what love is. Love does not suspect anything, it is never jealous. Love never interferes in the freedom of others. Love does not require anything other. Love gives freedom, and freedom can only exist if there is space in being together.
That's the beauty of Kahlil Gibran ... intuition is important. In love, you should be happy to see that his woman is happy with someone else, because Love wants his woman is happy, the love that her husband wants to be happy, so if you are talking with another woman and is happy, the wife should be happy, there is no need to raise discussion.
Two people are together to make their lives happier, rather the opposite happens. It seems that all the wives and husbands are all together to make each other miserable, ruining each other for life. The reason is this: they do not understand even the meaning of love.
Let there be spaces in your togetherness ... is not a contradiction. The more space you give each other, the more you are together. More freedom you allow yourself, you will be more closely united. And you will not be enemies close, but close friends!
of you dance to And let the winds of heaven. This is a basic law of existence: being too much together, leaving no room for freedom, it destroys the flower of love. It is crushed, no one leaves the room to grow.
For years, scientists have discovered that animals have a territory, mark their living space. You've seen dogs that pee on the poles, do you think is useless? Not at all: they are drawing the borders: "This is my territory." The smell of urine will prevent all the other dogs to enter in that space: as long as other dogs are just a step away, ignored, if they exceed those limits immediately break out of the fray.
All wild animals do the same thing. Even a lion does not get you anything, if not exceed the boundaries of its territory and considers you a gentleman! If, however, enter into his kingdom, no matter who you are, you will be killed.
We still have not found the same requirement of living space in the human esserei: surely you shall have received, but has not yet been established on a scientific basis. If you use a local train to go to Bombay, you'll find it so crowded ... the people are all standing, few are able to find a place to sit. But look people che stanno in piedi: anche se sono strette le une alle altre, fanno di tutto per non toccarsi.
Man mano che il mondo sarà sempre più sovrappopolato, aumenterà la gente che impazzisce, che si suicida, che compie omicidi, per il semplice motivo che non trova un proprio spazio vitale.
Gli amanti, quanto meno, dovrebbero essere abbastanza sensibili: la moglie ha bisogno del proprio spazio e così il marito.
Uno dei libri che amo di più è una delle ultime opere poetiche di Rabindranath Tagore, “Akhari Kavita” (“L’ultimo poema”). Non si tratta di una raccolta di poesie, ma di un racconto, sebbene strano, estremamente profondo e ricco di intuizioni.
Una giovane donna and a man fell in love and, as always happens, just wanted to get married. The woman put only one condition ... was highly educated, very sophisticated, very rich. And the man said, "I accept whatever your condition, but I can not live without you."
She replied: "First of all listen to my condition, then think about it. It is not a condition any ... we do not live in the house. I own a great property and a beautiful lake surrounded by trees, gardens and meadows: I'll build a house on the other side, just opposite to where I live. "
Man comment: "But so what is the point to get married."
She explained: "Getting married does not mean destroying each other. I give you your space, and I keep mine. Once in a while, walking in the garden we could meet. Once in a while, as we go boating on the lake, we can meet ... by chance! Or sometimes I'll invite you to take tea with me, or you can invite me. "
The man said: "This idea is simply absurd."
To which she concluded: "So forget the wedding. This is the only right idea, just so our love will continue to grow, because we will always remain fresh and new one in the eyes of the other, we do not presume ... I will preserve the right to refuse your invitation, and you still have the freedom to refuse to mine in any way our freedoms are eroded. And between these two freedoms grows the wonderful phenomenon of love. "
Obviously the man could not understand and gave up the idea of \u200b\u200bgetting married in that state.
But Rabindranath reveals the same intuition Kahlil Gibran ... and they wrote virtually the same period.
If this is possible - if you can have space and privacy at the same time - then you will dance between the winds of heaven .
Love one another but make not a bond of love.
Love should be a gift given and taken freely, but there should be no pretense. Otherwise, soon you'll be together and yet distant and remote as the stars. Nothing will bring you closer understanding
more: you have not left enough space to build a bridge that connects you.
rather be a moving sea between the shores of your souls ... make not a static thing, make not a routine rather be a moving sea between the shores of your souls.
If you can have both freedom and love, you will not need more than another. You got everything, everything that you live there will have been given.
Let there be space ...
In "Prophet" by Kahlil Gibran, Almustafa says Let there be spaces in your togetherness, and between you dance to the winds of heaven.
Love one another but make not a bond of love: Let it rather be a moving sea between the shores of your souls.
If your being together is not the result of lust, your love will go deeper and deeper with the passage of time. Lust flattens everything, since biology does not care that you stay together or not. His only interest is reproduction, for which love is not necessary: \u200b\u200byou can continue to produce children without love.
I looked all sorts of animals. I lived in the forests, mountains, and I've always been perplexed when the animals make love always seem very sad.
I've never seen one animal to make love with joy, it seems that some unknown force requires them to do so. It is not the result of their choice, not their freedom but their slavery. This makes them sad.
I have seen the same thing in humans. Have you ever seen a husband and wife in the street? Maybe you do not know if two people are husband and wife, but if both have a sad face can be some who are married!
When traveling by train from Delhi to Srinagar and in my compartment was just another empty seat. He arrived a couple of young people: a man and a woman beautiful. Since both could not sit in the only empty seat, he went into another compartment. But at each station is presented with sweets, fruit, flowers.
I watched that show ... I'm not just a mere observer ... at one point I asked the woman what they were married, and she said: "For about seven years."
I said, "Do not lie! You can not fool anyone but me ... you are not married. "
was shocked. A stranger, with whom he had never spoken ... that it only had to look at, and I wondered how I had understood.
I said: "It is a great discovery, it is something basic. If it were your husband, you'd be lucky if, once gone, reappear at the station of arrival. "
He said: "I do not know, nor do I know you. But what you say is true. He's my lover, a friend of my husband. "
commented: "In this case everything is clear."
What goes wrong between husbands and wives, even after a marriage of love? The fact is that this is not love, and all have accepted it, as if they knew what love is: it is pure and simple lust. Soon you'll be tired of each other. Biology has deceived you to fulfill their biological program, aimed at procreation, and in a matter of not finding anything new: the same face, the same geography, the same topography. How many times have you explored? Because of the marriage the whole world lives in sorrow, yet all are still unaware of the case.
Love is one of the most mysterious phenomena that exist. And it is love that Almustafa are talking about: if it is not lust you can not get bored.
Almustafa says Let there be spaces in your togetherness.
're together, but do not try to dominate you, do not try to have them and not destroy the individuality of others.
Unfortunately, it is what is done everywhere. Why should a woman take the man's name? It has its own name, has its own individuality. Think of a man who takes the name of the woman no man will ever do.
Why she should go home to live with man? Why should not he be the man to live in the house of the woman?
Sometimes it happens that a man marries a condition to go home to live with his wife, because her parents are elderly and have no other children to take care of them. But have you noticed? When a man goes to live in the house of his wife, is blamed by all. Is mocked, as if he had lost his manhood ... while no one laughs at the woman.
My advice is this: when a man and a woman decide to live together, each should have his own house. No one should go to the house of the other, because the very moment someone goes home to someone else inevitably becomes a slave, and slaves can not be happy. They have lost their integrity, their individuality. They sold themselves.
If you live together, that there is room left ... if the husband comes home late, no need for the wife questioned him about where he was, sul perché è in ritardo. Egli ha diritto alla propria libertà, è un individuo libero. Siete due individui che vivono insieme e nessuno invade lo spazio dell’altro. Se la moglie torna tardi, non è necessario chiederle dove è stata. Chi sei per farlo? Lei ha la propria libertà, il proprio spazio.
Purtroppo questo accade ogni giorno, in tutte le case: la gente litiga per inezie, ma in profondità l’elemento della discordia è che nessuno è pronto a lasciare che l’altro abbia il proprio spazio, la propria libertà.
Le cose che piacciono possono essere diverse. A tuo marito può piacere qualcosa, a te qualcos’altro. Questo non vuol dire che dobbiate iniziare a litigare perché, as a husband and wife should have the same preferences.
And then, all these questions ... every husband, when he returned home, ruminating in his mind the same questions: "What do I ask? How to respond? ". And she already knows what to ask and what her husband will answer, and he knows all those answers are false, fabricated. The husband is cheating ...
What love is this: always suspicious, always afraid, victim of some jealousy? If your wife sees you with another woman - even if you're just laughing and talking - is enough to fight all night. And you regret your choice: this is too ... just for a little rice 'with someone else! And if the husband sees his wife with another man and she is more happy, more happy, it is sufficient to create unrest, turmoil in his soul.
People are unaware that absolutely does not know what love is. Love does not suspect anything, it is never jealous. Love never interferes in the freedom of others. Love does not require anything other. Love gives freedom, and freedom can only exist if there is space in being together.
That's the beauty of Kahlil Gibran ... intuition is important. In love, you should be happy to see that his woman is happy with someone else, because Love wants his woman is happy, the love that her husband wants to be happy, so if you are talking with another woman and is happy, the wife should be happy, there is no need to raise discussion.
Two people are together to make their lives happier, rather the opposite happens. It seems that all the wives and husbands are all together to make each other miserable, ruining each other for life. The reason is this: they do not understand even the meaning of love.
Let there be spaces in your togetherness ... is not a contradiction. The more space you give each other, the more you are together. More freedom you allow yourself, you will be more closely united. And you will not be enemies close, but close friends!
of you dance to And let the winds of heaven. This is a basic law of existence: being too much together, leaving no room for freedom, it destroys the flower of love. It is crushed, no one leaves the room to grow.
For years, scientists have discovered that animals have a territory, mark their living space. You've seen dogs that pee on the poles, do you think is useless? Not at all: they are drawing the borders: "This is my territory." The smell of urine will prevent all the other dogs to enter in that space: as long as other dogs are just a step away, ignored, if they exceed those limits immediately break out of the fray.
All wild animals do the same thing. Even a lion does not get you anything, if not exceed the boundaries of its territory and considers you a gentleman! If, however, enter into his kingdom, no matter who you are, you will be killed.
We still have not found the same requirement of living space in the human esserei: surely you shall have received, but has not yet been established on a scientific basis. If you use a local train to go to Bombay, you'll find it so crowded ... the people are all standing, few are able to find a place to sit. But look people che stanno in piedi: anche se sono strette le une alle altre, fanno di tutto per non toccarsi.
Man mano che il mondo sarà sempre più sovrappopolato, aumenterà la gente che impazzisce, che si suicida, che compie omicidi, per il semplice motivo che non trova un proprio spazio vitale.
Gli amanti, quanto meno, dovrebbero essere abbastanza sensibili: la moglie ha bisogno del proprio spazio e così il marito.
Uno dei libri che amo di più è una delle ultime opere poetiche di Rabindranath Tagore, “Akhari Kavita” (“L’ultimo poema”). Non si tratta di una raccolta di poesie, ma di un racconto, sebbene strano, estremamente profondo e ricco di intuizioni.
Una giovane donna and a man fell in love and, as always happens, just wanted to get married. The woman put only one condition ... was highly educated, very sophisticated, very rich. And the man said, "I accept whatever your condition, but I can not live without you."
She replied: "First of all listen to my condition, then think about it. It is not a condition any ... we do not live in the house. I own a great property and a beautiful lake surrounded by trees, gardens and meadows: I'll build a house on the other side, just opposite to where I live. "
Man comment: "But so what is the point to get married."
She explained: "Getting married does not mean destroying each other. I give you your space, and I keep mine. Once in a while, walking in the garden we could meet. Once in a while, as we go boating on the lake, we can meet ... by chance! Or sometimes I'll invite you to take tea with me, or you can invite me. "
The man said: "This idea is simply absurd."
To which she concluded: "So forget the wedding. This is the only right idea, just so our love will continue to grow, because we will always remain fresh and new one in the eyes of the other, we do not presume ... I will preserve the right to refuse your invitation, and you still have the freedom to refuse to mine in any way our freedoms are eroded. And between these two freedoms grows the wonderful phenomenon of love. "
Obviously the man could not understand and gave up the idea of \u200b\u200bgetting married in that state.
But Rabindranath reveals the same intuition Kahlil Gibran ... and they wrote virtually the same period.
If this is possible - if you can have space and privacy at the same time - then you will dance between the winds of heaven .
Love one another but make not a bond of love.
Love should be a gift given and taken freely, but there should be no pretense. Otherwise, soon you'll be together and yet distant and remote as the stars. Nothing will bring you closer understanding
more: you have not left enough space to build a bridge that connects you.
rather be a moving sea between the shores of your souls ... make not a static thing, make not a routine rather be a moving sea between the shores of your souls.
If you can have both freedom and love, you will not need more than another. You got everything, everything that you live there will have been given.
- from "With you and without you" of Osho -
Monday, February 14, 2011
Compact Flashmaximumwrites
SE '
Charles Chaplin - on the occasion of his 70th birthday
A hug of light for all
Joseph Buffalo http://lucideimaestri.altervista.org 
Love of Self
When I started to really love me, I are made contoche suffering and emotional pain are just a avvertimentoche tells me not to live against my verità.Oggi I know this is called authenticity '
When I started to really love me, I had intended to impose capitocom'è embarrassing somebody my desires, knowing that the time was not ripe and the person was not ready, even if that person io.Oggi I know that this is called RESPECT FOR YOURSELF.
When I started to really love me, I want another smessodi life and I realized that everything I circondaé crescere.Oggi an invitation to know that this is called mature '.
When I started to really love me, I get to find sempreed at every opportunity in the right place at the right time and everything that happens to be quelloche bene.Da tranquillo.Oggi then I could feel I know this is called RESPECT FOR YOURSELF.
When I started to really love me, I stopped to deprive me of my Leisure to conceive grandiose plans for the futuro.Oggi just do what gives me joy and fun, what I love and that makes me laugh my way and with My ritmi.Oggi I know this is called SINCERITY '.
When I started to really love me, I got rid of everything ie not made me the good: food, people, things, situations and everything cioce pull me down when I left myself at the beginning I called it a "healthy selfishness" but now I know this is LOVE IF '
When I started to really love me, I stopped wanting to have more so I made less ragione.E errori.Oggi I realized that this is simply called'.
When I started to really love me, I refused to live in passatoe to worry about my futuro.Ora live more in the present moment, where everything has a luogo.E 'my condition of life and I call PERFECTION.
When I started to really love me, I realized that my thoughts and malato.Ma puòrendermi miserable when I summoned the energy of my heart, the intellect is diventatoun importante.Oggi partner in this union do 'as diSAGGEZZA HEART.
We must not continue to fear the contrasts, conflicts and problems with ourselves and with altriperché even the stars, sometimes you scontrarno as to give rise to new mondi.Oggi know that THIS IS LIFE!
When I started to really love me, I are made contoche suffering and emotional pain are just a avvertimentoche tells me not to live against my verità.Oggi I know this is called authenticity '
When I started to really love me, I had intended to impose capitocom'è embarrassing somebody my desires, knowing that the time was not ripe and the person was not ready, even if that person io.Oggi I know that this is called RESPECT FOR YOURSELF.
When I started to really love me, I want another smessodi life and I realized that everything I circondaé crescere.Oggi an invitation to know that this is called mature '.
When I started to really love me, I get to find sempreed at every opportunity in the right place at the right time and everything that happens to be quelloche bene.Da tranquillo.Oggi then I could feel I know this is called RESPECT FOR YOURSELF.
When I started to really love me, I stopped to deprive me of my Leisure to conceive grandiose plans for the futuro.Oggi just do what gives me joy and fun, what I love and that makes me laugh my way and with My ritmi.Oggi I know this is called SINCERITY '.
When I started to really love me, I got rid of everything ie not made me the good: food, people, things, situations and everything cioce pull me down when I left myself at the beginning I called it a "healthy selfishness" but now I know this is LOVE IF '
When I started to really love me, I stopped wanting to have more so I made less ragione.E errori.Oggi I realized that this is simply called'.
When I started to really love me, I refused to live in passatoe to worry about my futuro.Ora live more in the present moment, where everything has a luogo.E 'my condition of life and I call PERFECTION.
When I started to really love me, I realized that my thoughts and malato.Ma puòrendermi miserable when I summoned the energy of my heart, the intellect is diventatoun importante.Oggi partner in this union do 'as diSAGGEZZA HEART.
We must not continue to fear the contrasts, conflicts and problems with ourselves and with altriperché even the stars, sometimes you scontrarno as to give rise to new mondi.Oggi know that THIS IS LIFE!
Charles Chaplin - on the occasion of his 70th birthday
A hug of light for all
Joseph Buffalo http://lucideimaestri.altervista.org
Cute Hairdos For Snowboarding
Doubt vanished from his mind in minutes. The confusion is dissolved, leaving room for a white light and tasteless that seeped from the tiny window that looked out on the town hall.
It was all a dream, a terrible dream in its sublime perfection.
In the wake, the world returned to his reassuring monochrome, illuminating the room furnished with gray plastic and glass. Rick
Mauler suffered increasingly disturbing hallucinations during sleep.
I remember as a child he had often heard of, called them "Dreams", but never, in his memory, he had suffered. Until ten days ago.
What was happening to him?
the liquid, at least for the moment, classifying them as responses to sustained pressure at work. His department
fact, in a few days, would be subject to inspection by the External Affairs Section of the Federation. All his energies were focused on getting the best performance by the workers of which he was responsible. He could not afford to be ousted for lack of reliability on the part of his subordinates. He was giving her best, although his health was obviously deteriorating. That night disturbance, not made him stand as he had done. And then the extreme rigidity with which he was doing, was giving him to get the resentment of his men.
Before leaving your room, eased the solar filter. The outer surface was lit by three suns, which arose at the same time that day. Rick swore, it was impossible to reach the surface, rendering off-limits to any living thing that was not Xenoriano. One of the difficulties of the expedition, terrestrial underestimated in the design, was the lack of a recognizable pattern of only three in the rotation. The three gravitational fields is continuing influence is variable and uncontrolled.
The mining operations were to be programmate nuovamente per la notte. Dal freddo si potevano riparare. Dal caldo rovente di quel pianeta, era impossibile.
Nel vestirsi, prese l’appunto mentale di ricordarsi di inoltrare la richiesta di scorta militare per gli operai notturni. In cuor suo coltivava la speranza che il presidio dell’Ordine non si spazientisse per le continue richieste di supporto da parte dei civili. Era ben consapevole che avevano loro stessi i propri affari a cui badare, non si sarebbe stupito in un qualche rifiuto prima o poi, non appena la resistenza Xenoriana si fosse fatta più pressante, per fare un esempio.
In tal caso, avrebbero potuto dire addio alla pelle. Tutti quanti.
Meticoloso, come sempre, si preparò al lungo giorno.
The long corridors aseptic, were plastered with looks of approval to it, most siu approached the mining department, the more it turned into hatred and ill-concealed contempt.
He knew he could do little to regain the esteem of the settlers, but in the end it was the work that the Federation had chosen for him, how could she disappoint a lot of expectation and confidence?
extreme of the visual field on a stain color caught his attention. Who had dared to wear a color, outside of your room? In those days? He turned
but that fragment of colored cloth, vanished around the corner from a corrodoio. Mauler followed, had to stop that in the bud ... Whatever it was, had to end immediately.
The deserted corridor, made him feel stupid. He did not like that feeling. He felt watched and turned in time to see that color again.
He was softening. He decided to return to his duties, to conclude as soon as possible and return to rest for at least another hour.
mining came to the bridge, the first thing, checked that everything was doing with a certain order. I do not detect abnormalities.
He called all the teams in extracting, updating them on the fact that the shift was that night. Obviously they were not stupid, they were first noticed in observing the surface, which was impassable.
Li said, before it reached a revelation.
"Attendetemi everybody here, I had an idea to avoid the night shift."
"Yes sir!"
Mauler, climbed the stairs in steel with cold determination, to the control room of the mining sector. At that hour was deserted, there was the need to coordinate the units outside for several hours.
But what was that idea which had just blathered before? He could not have more to remember.
front of the console commands, turned on the ignition. A series of control lights came on intermittently for several seconds, then go out or stabilize.
What was he doing there?
pressed a button.
He did not usually operate the controls of the console.
pressed a second button. Why
acted with so much security? What activates those controls?
A third button lit up bright green.
could not stop his hands. They do not want to stay? The fourth indicator
vibrated even more actively in the other three.
In a lucid moment he read the writings on the console. In his view consciousness is crystallized in a moment of terror, just before you press the big red button.
------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------
"Hey guys, you heard what happened in area 12? A big shot, a Mauler, blew himself up in his department. It seems that the Federation had put under pressure .. What spineless
not stand .. They say that he was organizing teams of extraction. the nice thing is that no agreement has nothing! Calm and quiet, he opened one, two, three, four valves of compressed gas. In a flash, has wiped out entire units of six extraction. Boom!
really absurd. Right now they are recruiting in a hurry!
bastard at least something good he did, releasing jobs. But all the equipment .. what a waste. Sbrocca bad thing so .. "The man did not know what
he was talking about, but decided not to intervene. That ordinary people did their own ideas, helped to divert attention from the bigger picture.
Max's eyes, everything was more than clear, even if he never imagined would happen so quickly. The
Xenoriani were evolving, they had already achieved a form of evolution tiny and dangerous to humans. He had to move fast. The thing that amazed him most was the fact that it had not been warned by the Order of the incident.
He had to know immediately of such anomalies in the behavior of the colony.
Sunday, February 13, 2011
How Many Days Do People Ski?
What to do?
Source: http://www.polyarchy.org/basta/sussurri/index.html
In 1863 he appeared in a literary text that made great impression on the Russian youth for the originality of the story and the lucidity of ideas presented.
Its author's name was Nikolai Chernysevsky and the novel was entitled What to do? A tale of new people . When Lenin wrote his pamphlet on political party and the tasks it had to do the titled What to do? appropriating the title perhaps also hoping to enjoy part the popularity of the text had Chernysevsky between people, especially young women, eager for change.
What to do? is a question that all people ask when they are in a new situation and, in the presence of multiple options, they must make decisions that deviate from the daily routine. For a person
innovative, willing to experiment, to address new problems and look for new solutions is an integral part of his life and this is very positive because it enables progress in all fields. Many others shy away from new challenges and like to follow the beaten paths and decisions taken by others. However, in that course of action there is nothing objectionable, and indeed it is necessary that there are also people that consolidate some of the choices made by others to the point where they can become, if they are valid and extremely functional, general protocols of behavior that become part of General routine.
Instead, what is not acceptable and it is extremely regrettable is when people are blocked by the innovative experience of other individuals or groups who, for various reasons (eg. Ignorance, fear, pure and simple interest on location) resist change and want to impose on all a way of life from certain unacceptable. At that point, the question What to do? becomes un imperativo urgente se non si vuole che la massa dei consuetudinari, interessati al mantenimento dello status quo, non trascini tutti in un degrado e in una decadenza senza fine.
Nelle società europee e, nello specifico, nel caso della società italiana, sembra proprio che siamo arrivati al punto in cui un numero crescente di persone si pone, apertamente o implicitamente, la domanda Che Fare? per uscire dall’impasse e dal conseguente scontento che li domina. Io sono convinto che nel corso di questo decennio o troviamo risposte pratiche intelligenti a questa domanda o tutti noi saremo condannati ad una insoddisfazione e a un disagio crescenti.
A questo punto è necessario però porre una pre-condizione to ensure that the freedom to experiment intended by one does not result in situations of oppression or disadvantage to others.
This means that those who are eager to experiment must propose solutions to the concerns of conservation eager to maintain their beliefs and their behavior without someone to feel constrained or disadvantaged (not to say the least) on the choices made by anyone . To make a specific reference to current events, this means that Egypt's President Mubarak supporters who see any change as a leap of faith, held their president, if the fund with their money and follow the laws he wants to enact for his followers, while those who do not want Mubarak are perfectly free to withdraw their (forced) support, are no longer required to maintain through taxes (mandatory), and there may be other laws and other protection systems. All this clearly in a context of mutual respect, non-interference and peaceful coexistence that is not hard to imagine a time that the bullying had ceased on all sides.
At this point I already imagine some turn up their mouths and declare the proposal a complete nonsense. A little 'as did the opponents of religious tolerance when proclaimed totally ridiculous and absurd that a Protestant and a Catholic could live side by side without having to impose on each other's faiths religious. This thing you want is then carried out peacefully and at that point, even the slowest-witted they understood that it was religious persecution and taxation that were born the wars of religion and hatred for each other. Similarly, perhaps it will be clear to all, a pretty near future I hope, that is persecution and taxation policies that created most of the conflicts that give rise to clashes then more or less violent.
The proposal that is advanced here is therefore that of volunteers parallel societies, organized independently by individuals based on their free choices, with the utmost respect for each other. This is an idea that is gaining a bit 'of time e che non tarderà a un certo punto ad apparire come la classica scoperta dell'acqua calda o dell’uovo di Colombo tale è la sua semplicità, funzionalità, razionalità. Come ebbe a dire Arthur Schopenhauer, la verità, prima di emergere, passa generalmente attraverso tre fasi: nella prima fase essa è ridicolizzata, poi è violentemente contrastata, e infine è accettata come un dato del tutto naturale.
Probabilmente tale è il destino anche di questa idea che si farà strada solo dopo che molti saranno passati attraverso esperienze assurde pur di non mettere in discussione i precetti in cui sono cresciuti (la democrazia maggioritaria, lo stato territoriale, l'identità nazionale e via dicendo) and they consider unquestionable dogma to be imposed on everyone, whether they like it or not. Eventually they too will realize that the alternative, reduced in its essential terms, is this:
to moving further towards the implementation of parallel societies in fact voluntary my suggestion on what to do? boils down to three points list rather than treat:
culturally Escape from statism. many who speak against the father was master can not imagine a future without the state and continue to use words and expressions totally soaked and statism recall situations in the past. Yet without a profound change in their way of thinking and his language there is even a chance to make concrete proposals alternatives. When, for example, as a journalist Oscar Giannino still confuses law with rule of law (as well Carmelo Miragliotta noted in a speech recently on Facebook) means that we are really in a bad situation of cultural obscurantism and confusion.
Escape materially from statism. When a new paradigm begins to emerge in the brains of the old constraints mental collapse and has the strength and creativity not only to implement but also to formulate concrete proposals that only until shortly before might have seemed crazy (eg. create the circuits of production and consumption, which act as clubs and use alternative means of payment to the fiat currency imposed by the state).
Defending concretely by statism. even now need to be developed by TDI statism, for example by making available to others for free, and naturally their knowledge in law, economics, computer science, etc..
Clearly I only touched the issue but I hope there will be time to go also to the specific, targeted interventions of many others. The only thing we absolutely must not do is let us stop not only by fears but also by the illusions and fetishes of the past, the words magic and mythical figures.
As Jacques Prevert wrote:
Source: http://www.polyarchy.org/basta/sussurri/index.html
In 1863 he appeared in a literary text that made great impression on the Russian youth for the originality of the story and the lucidity of ideas presented.
Its author's name was Nikolai Chernysevsky and the novel was entitled What to do? A tale of new people . When Lenin wrote his pamphlet on political party and the tasks it had to do the titled What to do? appropriating the title perhaps also hoping to enjoy part the popularity of the text had Chernysevsky between people, especially young women, eager for change.
What to do? is a question that all people ask when they are in a new situation and, in the presence of multiple options, they must make decisions that deviate from the daily routine. For a person
innovative, willing to experiment, to address new problems and look for new solutions is an integral part of his life and this is very positive because it enables progress in all fields. Many others shy away from new challenges and like to follow the beaten paths and decisions taken by others. However, in that course of action there is nothing objectionable, and indeed it is necessary that there are also people that consolidate some of the choices made by others to the point where they can become, if they are valid and extremely functional, general protocols of behavior that become part of General routine.
Instead, what is not acceptable and it is extremely regrettable is when people are blocked by the innovative experience of other individuals or groups who, for various reasons (eg. Ignorance, fear, pure and simple interest on location) resist change and want to impose on all a way of life from certain unacceptable. At that point, the question What to do? becomes un imperativo urgente se non si vuole che la massa dei consuetudinari, interessati al mantenimento dello status quo, non trascini tutti in un degrado e in una decadenza senza fine.
Nelle società europee e, nello specifico, nel caso della società italiana, sembra proprio che siamo arrivati al punto in cui un numero crescente di persone si pone, apertamente o implicitamente, la domanda Che Fare? per uscire dall’impasse e dal conseguente scontento che li domina. Io sono convinto che nel corso di questo decennio o troviamo risposte pratiche intelligenti a questa domanda o tutti noi saremo condannati ad una insoddisfazione e a un disagio crescenti.
A questo punto è necessario però porre una pre-condizione to ensure that the freedom to experiment intended by one does not result in situations of oppression or disadvantage to others.
This means that those who are eager to experiment must propose solutions to the concerns of conservation eager to maintain their beliefs and their behavior without someone to feel constrained or disadvantaged (not to say the least) on the choices made by anyone . To make a specific reference to current events, this means that Egypt's President Mubarak supporters who see any change as a leap of faith, held their president, if the fund with their money and follow the laws he wants to enact for his followers, while those who do not want Mubarak are perfectly free to withdraw their (forced) support, are no longer required to maintain through taxes (mandatory), and there may be other laws and other protection systems. All this clearly in a context of mutual respect, non-interference and peaceful coexistence that is not hard to imagine a time that the bullying had ceased on all sides.
At this point I already imagine some turn up their mouths and declare the proposal a complete nonsense. A little 'as did the opponents of religious tolerance when proclaimed totally ridiculous and absurd that a Protestant and a Catholic could live side by side without having to impose on each other's faiths religious. This thing you want is then carried out peacefully and at that point, even the slowest-witted they understood that it was religious persecution and taxation that were born the wars of religion and hatred for each other. Similarly, perhaps it will be clear to all, a pretty near future I hope, that is persecution and taxation policies that created most of the conflicts that give rise to clashes then more or less violent.
The proposal that is advanced here is therefore that of volunteers parallel societies, organized independently by individuals based on their free choices, with the utmost respect for each other. This is an idea that is gaining a bit 'of time e che non tarderà a un certo punto ad apparire come la classica scoperta dell'acqua calda o dell’uovo di Colombo tale è la sua semplicità, funzionalità, razionalità. Come ebbe a dire Arthur Schopenhauer, la verità, prima di emergere, passa generalmente attraverso tre fasi: nella prima fase essa è ridicolizzata, poi è violentemente contrastata, e infine è accettata come un dato del tutto naturale.
Probabilmente tale è il destino anche di questa idea che si farà strada solo dopo che molti saranno passati attraverso esperienze assurde pur di non mettere in discussione i precetti in cui sono cresciuti (la democrazia maggioritaria, lo stato territoriale, l'identità nazionale e via dicendo) and they consider unquestionable dogma to be imposed on everyone, whether they like it or not. Eventually they too will realize that the alternative, reduced in its essential terms, is this:
parallel societies or voluntary war (in) civil obligation.
to moving further towards the implementation of parallel societies in fact voluntary my suggestion on what to do? boils down to three points list rather than treat:
culturally Escape from statism. many who speak against the father was master can not imagine a future without the state and continue to use words and expressions totally soaked and statism recall situations in the past. Yet without a profound change in their way of thinking and his language there is even a chance to make concrete proposals alternatives. When, for example, as a journalist Oscar Giannino still confuses law with rule of law (as well Carmelo Miragliotta noted in a speech recently on Facebook) means that we are really in a bad situation of cultural obscurantism and confusion.
Escape materially from statism. When a new paradigm begins to emerge in the brains of the old constraints mental collapse and has the strength and creativity not only to implement but also to formulate concrete proposals that only until shortly before might have seemed crazy (eg. create the circuits of production and consumption, which act as clubs and use alternative means of payment to the fiat currency imposed by the state).
Defending concretely by statism. even now need to be developed by TDI statism, for example by making available to others for free, and naturally their knowledge in law, economics, computer science, etc..
Clearly I only touched the issue but I hope there will be time to go also to the specific, targeted interventions of many others. The only thing we absolutely must not do is let us stop not only by fears but also by the illusions and fetishes of the past, the words magic and mythical figures.
As Jacques Prevert wrote:
"if the plaignait de ne pas avancer. (He complained about not advancing.)
the suivait Pourtant son idée. (And yet following his own idea.)
C'était une idée fixe. "(It was an obsession.)
Saturday, February 12, 2011
Still Need Running Shoes If You Have Orthopedics
Here's what some famous naturalists think
Source: AVA - Association Vegetarian animal rights, non-profit organization
Adapted from EVU News, N ° 2 / 1996
Prof. Luis Vallejo Rodrigue z
Vegetarian Secretary of the Canary Islands.
He now believes that man must eat meat to have a balanced diet that contains high quality proteins. The state even as eminent Chartered Govian Francisco Grande, who died recently, considered the highest authority in Spain in terms of nutrition. To this we must add that the Ministry of Health recommends eating meat that most people eat it and sees it as a good food. However, despite this, it is surprising that the most famous naturalists of mankind were vegetarians or at least have one after another declared that man is by nature vegetarian.
We consider that the term "vegetarian" and "vegetarian" appeared at the 1838, then, before that date, do not find them in any text, and that's why naturalists speak of food of vegetable or plant arrangements. The non-existence of these terms makes it difficult investigations.
more, to know if a famous naturalist was vegetarian or not, we read the biographies of each. The biographies are difficult if not impossible to find, because not all were written. They were written biographies on famous artists, but very few on men of science. In this there is another difficulty: the lack of interest of the writers for the eating habits of the characters on which they wrote. That's how Colin Spencer, for example, in his book The Heretics Feast complains that between sixty biographies of Leonardo da Vinci only two say that he was a vegetarian. Despite all these difficulties, the statements of the most famous Natural Heritage have expressed a very clear message and a proof of this, read what they said:
John Ray (1628-1704) was considered the father of history English naturalist and was founded in his honor, an association that bears his name: "The Ray Society. The following John Ray:
Another famous naturalist Carl Linnaeus is (1707-1778), Doctor of the Swedish Navy, President of the Academy of Sciences, and Professor of Botany at the University of Stockholm and Uppsala. Linnéa has created the method of natural classification of plants and animals, still used, although two centuries. Linnéa wrote:
Il naturalista francese Georges Louis Leclerc , meglio conosciuto come Conte di Buffon (1707-1778) fu membro dell’Accademia delle Scienze, Amministratore del Giardino del Re e, con la collaborazione di molti altri, ha scritto: “Storia Naturale” in 36 volumi. Buffon ha determined that:
Dr. Aubenton a collaborator of Louis de Buffon, Daubenton better known as a former professor of Mineralogy at the King's Garden and Natural History at the School of Medicine, states:
Georges Cuvier (1769-1832) naturalista francese, anatomista e geologo. Fu professore presso la Scuola e il Museo di Francia, Segretario dell’Accademia delle Scienze e Cancelliere dell’Università. Creò la teoria dell’Anatomia Comparata e la Paleontologia. Grazie ai suoi studi abbiamo potuto ricostruire specie per specie quelle scomparse. Cuvier ricevette i titoli di Barone, Grande Ufficiale della Legion d’Onore; fu onorato da Napoleone primo, Luigi XVIII e Luigi Filippo. Cuvier dichiarò nella sua opera Lezioni di Anatomia Comparata che:
Torniamo su alcune constatazioni fatte dal Cuvier:
Fonte: " Le règne animal " di Georges Cuvier (Baron). Tome I - 1817 p. 86
Source: "The animal kingdom " by Georges Cuvier (Baron). Tome I - 1829 p. 73
Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859), German naturalist, explorer and geographer. Provide studies on magnetism and supported the theory of the origin of igneous rocks. It is considered the founder of the climatology of terrestrial morphology, geography and physical geography of the oceans of the planets. He wrote a work in thirty volumes entitled Worlds and Travels in the equinoctial regions of the New World . Humboldt says this:
Richard Owen (1804-1892) English naturalist, Cuvier studied, cataloged the collection of hunting in the British Museum is home to the Natural History Museum in South Kensington. He studied comparative anatomy and physiology. He wrote Courses Comparative Anatomy, Paleontology e Fisiologia dei Vertebrati . Owen ha detto:
Sicuramente The most famous of all English naturalists agreed with other naturalists. I refer to Charles Darwin (1800-1882) who at age 22 began a world tour that lasted five years. During the voyage Darwin collected material that was used to publish the most famous of his books in 1859: the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection . Darwin was a member of the Royal Society of London, and after his death, was buried in Westminster Abbey funeral, with solemn and diplomatic presence of great nations to his funeral. Darwin wrote:
The classification form, and functions in the system (food) shows beyond doubt che il nutrimento normale dell’uomo è vegetale come quello degli antropoidi e delle scimmie, che i nostri canini sono meno sviluppati dei loro e che noi non siamo destinati a competere con le bestie selvagge o gli animali carnivori.
Nel suo libro L'origine dell'uomo e la scelta in rapporto col sesso (1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray. 1st ed. ) egli dice:
Thomas Henry Huxley (1825-1895), English doctor and anthropologist, claimed Darwin's theories and became president of the Royal Society. Among other things he wrote zoological evidence of man's place in Nature and in Anatomy Comparative . We read some statements by Huxley:
Sir Arthur Keith (1866-1955) famous British anatomist and anthropologist.
Together with Martin Flack , discovered the ganglion from which arise sinoauricolare contractions heart. Former Rector of the University of Aberdeen, wrote: Instructions for the Study of apes, Old and Wise Men Types of Human Evolution . This anthropologist tells us,
This research represents the most famous naturalists that humanity has ever had. We have noted that their studies were supported, and made reference to the comparison of the anatomy of man with that of other mammals, especially monkeys, and tell us about the shape of the teeth and digestive systems of these mammals. In this regard, all known naturalists have come to the same startling conclusion: man is vegetarian by nature and if the word "vegetarian" does not appear in their writings is because the term did not exist before 1838, and because studies of these naturalists famous were written before this date.
We could argue against vegetarianism that the images of prehistoric caves of the rocks show him as a hunter. This does not mean that meat is the ideal form of nutrition for humans. We must take into account that the anthropologist Alan Walker, of Johns Hopkins University, where he studied the fossil imprints of the teeth, he found an assortment of different foods. He reiterated that our early ancestors did not live mainly on meat, or seeds, or berries, leaves or grass, and even they were omnivores. It seems that they supported mainly by a regime of fruit. Found no exceptions. Each tooth was examined and those in hominids than 12 million years ago and inherited in a direct line from Homo Erectus, show that these hominids were eating fruit.
Alan Walker ( published in the New York Times, May 15, 1979 ).
Per concludere voglio porre ai lettori questa domanda: l’uomo è vegetariano per natura? Attualmente la maggior parte dei Dottori ci dicono che non lo è ma i più celebri naturalisti hanno deducting all it is.
If this is really so only a small minority of the population of developed countries, what we call vegetarians eat properly, while most people would eat in Improperly
Pr Luis Rodriguez Vallejo
Secretary of 'Vegetarian Association of the Canary Islands
Road 3557, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain
Prof Rodriguez has published three books in English:
- Healing from cancer through colon cleansing (1990)
- Nutrition and school success (1991)
- Il cancro e gli interessi correlati (e gli interessi che ne sono nati) (1993) 
Source: AVA - Association Vegetarian animal rights, non-profit organization
Adapted from EVU News, N ° 2 / 1996
Prof. Luis Vallejo Rodrigue z
Vegetarian Secretary of the Canary Islands.
He now believes that man must eat meat to have a balanced diet that contains high quality proteins. The state even as eminent Chartered Govian Francisco Grande, who died recently, considered the highest authority in Spain in terms of nutrition. To this we must add that the Ministry of Health recommends eating meat that most people eat it and sees it as a good food. However, despite this, it is surprising that the most famous naturalists of mankind were vegetarians or at least have one after another declared that man is by nature vegetarian.
We consider that the term "vegetarian" and "vegetarian" appeared at the 1838, then, before that date, do not find them in any text, and that's why naturalists speak of food of vegetable or plant arrangements. The non-existence of these terms makes it difficult investigations.
more, to know if a famous naturalist was vegetarian or not, we read the biographies of each. The biographies are difficult if not impossible to find, because not all were written. They were written biographies on famous artists, but very few on men of science. In this there is another difficulty: the lack of interest of the writers for the eating habits of the characters on which they wrote. That's how Colin Spencer, for example, in his book The Heretics Feast complains that between sixty biographies of Leonardo da Vinci only two say that he was a vegetarian. Despite all these difficulties, the statements of the most famous Natural Heritage have expressed a very clear message and a proof of this, read what they said:
John Ray (1628-1704) was considered the father of history English naturalist and was founded in his honor, an association that bears his name: "The Ray Society. The following John Ray:
There is no doubt that the man was not meant to be a carnivore.He also says:
A) That inviting, pleasant and innocent vision is the spectacle of a table so laden with difference and preparations of animal meat smoking, cut down and dead! In no way man has set up a carnivore. Hunt and voracity are not congenial. The man has neither teeth nor sharp nails to kill its prey. On the contrary his hands are made to pick fruits, berries, vegetables, and his teeth are suitable for chewing.
B) Anything that we need to nourish, refresh and delight is abundantly present in the inexhaustible stock of Nature. What a nice view, innocent and inviting a panel set up frugally, and that difference with a meal of steaming meat and animal killed. In summary, our farmers have all the delights imaginable while abattoirs and butchers are full of gore and foul smelling odor.
Another famous naturalist Carl Linnaeus is (1707-1778), Doctor of the Swedish Navy, President of the Academy of Sciences, and Professor of Botany at the University of Stockholm and Uppsala. Linnéa has created the method of natural classification of plants and animals, still used, although two centuries. Linnéa wrote:
A) The fruits and edible plants are the food più appropriato per l’uomo.
B) A partire dalla sua anatomia, l’uomo non è stato fisiologicamente progettato per mangiare carne.
C) I frutti sono il nutrimento più adatto all’uomo per via della conformazione dei suoi denti e del suo apparato digerente; ciò si evince da quel che è stato dimostrato attraverso la comparazione con i quadrupedi.
Il naturalista francese Georges Louis Leclerc , meglio conosciuto come Conte di Buffon (1707-1778) fu membro dell’Accademia delle Scienze, Amministratore del Giardino del Re e, con la collaborazione di molti altri, ha scritto: “Storia Naturale” in 36 volumi. Buffon ha determined that:
The man could only live plants. However, the whole of nature is not enough to satisfy his intemperance el'inconsistente variety of his appetite. Man alone consumes and devours more meat of all animals combined, without necessity, but in the form of abuse.
Dr. Aubenton a collaborator of Louis de Buffon, Daubenton better known as a former professor of Mineralogy at the King's Garden and Natural History at the School of Medicine, states:
It can be assumed that man, when live in a natural way and in a temperate climate where the earth produces of itself every sorta di frutti, se ne nutra e non mangi animali.
Georges Cuvier (1769-1832) naturalista francese, anatomista e geologo. Fu professore presso la Scuola e il Museo di Francia, Segretario dell’Accademia delle Scienze e Cancelliere dell’Università. Creò la teoria dell’Anatomia Comparata e la Paleontologia. Grazie ai suoi studi abbiamo potuto ricostruire specie per specie quelle scomparse. Cuvier ricevette i titoli di Barone, Grande Ufficiale della Legion d’Onore; fu onorato da Napoleone primo, Luigi XVIII e Luigi Filippo. Cuvier dichiarò nella sua opera Lezioni di Anatomia Comparata che:
L’Anatomia comparata ci insegna che in ogni dettaglio l’uomo somiglia agli animali frugivori e per niente ai carnivori … Solo camuffando la carne morta, resa più tenera da tecniche culinarie, è possibile per l’uomo masticarla e digerirla, solo così la vista di carni crude e sanguinolente non suscita orrore e disgusto .
Torniamo su alcune constatazioni fatte dal Cuvier:
A) La costituzione dei principali organi dell’uomo dimostra che la sua alimentazione non dovrebbe consistere in null’altro che dei vegetali.
B) Il cibo naturale dell’uomo, se consideriamo la sua struttura, dovrebbe consistere in frutta, radici, ortaggi (verdure).
C) L’intero corpo umano, fin nel più piccolo dettaglio, è destinato per natura ad un regime esclusivamente vegetale.
D) L’uomo sembra fatto per nutrirsi principalmente di frutta, radici e altre parti succulente (ricche d’acqua) dei vegetali. Le sue mani gli consentono facilmente di cogliere tutto ciò; d’altro canto, le sue mascelle corte e di forza media, i suoi canini uguali (di pari lunghezza) agli altri denti e i suoi molari a forma di tubero non gli permetterebbero né di brucare l’erba né di divorare la carne, a meno che egli non renda questi cibi commestibili attraverso la cottura.
Fonte: " Le règne animal " di Georges Cuvier (Baron). Tome I - 1817 p. 86
Source: "The animal kingdom " by Georges Cuvier (Baron). Tome I - 1829 p. 73
Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859), German naturalist, explorer and geographer. Provide studies on magnetism and supported the theory of the origin of igneous rocks. It is considered the founder of the climatology of terrestrial morphology, geography and physical geography of the oceans of the planets. He wrote a work in thirty volumes entitled Worlds and Travels in the equinoctial regions of the New World . Humboldt says this:
eat animals is not far dall'antropofagia and cannibalism. The same amount of land used to graze and feed cattle could feed ten people, then if we grow lentils, peas or beans, could feed a hundred people .... The Orinoco basin can produce sufficient quantities of bananas to feed all of humanity by a wide margin.
Richard Owen (1804-1892) English naturalist, Cuvier studied, cataloged the collection of hunting in the British Museum is home to the Natural History Museum in South Kensington. He studied comparative anatomy and physiology. He wrote Courses Comparative Anatomy, Paleontology e Fisiologia dei Vertebrati . Owen ha detto:
A) Gli antropoidi e tutti i quadrumani ricavano la loro alimentazione dai frutti, dai semi e da altre succose sostanze vegetali e la stretta analogia fra la struttura degli animali e quella dell’uomo dimostra palesemente il loro frugivorismo naturale.
B) Le scimmie, la cui dentizione è pressoché uguale a quella dell’uomo, vivono principalmente di frutta, noci ed altre varietà simili per consistenza, sapore e valore nutritivo elaborate dal mondo vegetale. La somiglianza profonda fra i denti dei quadrumani e quelli degli uomini dimostra che l’uomo era in origine adatto a mangiare i frutti degli alberi nel Paradiso.
Sicuramente The most famous of all English naturalists agreed with other naturalists. I refer to Charles Darwin (1800-1882) who at age 22 began a world tour that lasted five years. During the voyage Darwin collected material that was used to publish the most famous of his books in 1859: the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection . Darwin was a member of the Royal Society of London, and after his death, was buried in Westminster Abbey funeral, with solemn and diplomatic presence of great nations to his funeral. Darwin wrote:
The classification form, and functions in the system (food) shows beyond doubt che il nutrimento normale dell’uomo è vegetale come quello degli antropoidi e delle scimmie, che i nostri canini sono meno sviluppati dei loro e che noi non siamo destinati a competere con le bestie selvagge o gli animali carnivori.
Nel suo libro L'origine dell'uomo e la scelta in rapporto col sesso (1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray. 1st ed. ) egli dice:
At the period and place, whenever and wherever it may have been, when man first lost his hairy covering, he probably inhabited a hot country; and this would have been favourable for a frugiferous diet, on which, judging from analogy, he subsisted.
At any time, anywhere, whenever and wherever it may be followed, it is likely that the man, when he began to lose its qualification as a hair, living in a hot country, and this must have been in favor of a regime frugivorous, which, judging from analogy, he must have lived.
Thomas Henry Huxley (1825-1895), English doctor and anthropologist, claimed Darwin's theories and became president of the Royal Society. Among other things he wrote zoological evidence of man's place in Nature and in Anatomy Comparative . We read some statements by Huxley:
A) The man was first hunting and fire, could not therefore be omnivorous.
B) The length of the digestive system of man is 5-8 meters and the distance between the mouth and the coccyx from 50 to 80 cm, which gives us a ratio of 10, as for other fruit-eating animals and not carnivores like 3 or 20 as for herbivorous animals.
C) The only existing animal morphology with the bear is omnivorous, which has some sharp teeth and other dishes.
Sir Arthur Keith (1866-1955) famous British anatomist and anthropologist.
Together with Martin Flack , discovered the ganglion from which arise sinoauricolare contractions heart. Former Rector of the University of Aberdeen, wrote: Instructions for the Study of apes, Old and Wise Men Types of Human Evolution . This anthropologist tells us,
the chimpanzees and gorillas have the same human digestive mechanisms. It is evidence of comparative anatomy in favor of a regime that allows the fermentation of raw produce a lot of feces daily, and no soft rot.
This research represents the most famous naturalists that humanity has ever had. We have noted that their studies were supported, and made reference to the comparison of the anatomy of man with that of other mammals, especially monkeys, and tell us about the shape of the teeth and digestive systems of these mammals. In this regard, all known naturalists have come to the same startling conclusion: man is vegetarian by nature and if the word "vegetarian" does not appear in their writings is because the term did not exist before 1838, and because studies of these naturalists famous were written before this date.
We could argue against vegetarianism that the images of prehistoric caves of the rocks show him as a hunter. This does not mean that meat is the ideal form of nutrition for humans. We must take into account that the anthropologist Alan Walker, of Johns Hopkins University, where he studied the fossil imprints of the teeth, he found an assortment of different foods. He reiterated that our early ancestors did not live mainly on meat, or seeds, or berries, leaves or grass, and even they were omnivores. It seems that they supported mainly by a regime of fruit. Found no exceptions. Each tooth was examined and those in hominids than 12 million years ago and inherited in a direct line from Homo Erectus, show that these hominids were eating fruit.
Alan Walker ( published in the New York Times, May 15, 1979 ).
Preliminary studies of fossil teeth have led to the startling suggestion that our early human ancestors were not predominantly meat eaters or even eaters of seeds, shoots, leaves, or grassses. Nor were they omniverous. Instead, they appear to have subsisted chiefly on A DIET OF FRUIT. NO EXCEPTIONS HAVE BEEN FOUND. Every tooth examined from the hominids of the 12 million year period leading up to Homo-Erectus appeared to be that of a fruit eater.The Best Of Health: The 100 Health Best Books , by Sheldon Zerden.
Per concludere voglio porre ai lettori questa domanda: l’uomo è vegetariano per natura? Attualmente la maggior parte dei Dottori ci dicono che non lo è ma i più celebri naturalisti hanno deducting all it is.
If this is really so only a small minority of the population of developed countries, what we call vegetarians eat properly, while most people would eat in Improperly
Pr Luis Rodriguez Vallejo
Secretary of 'Vegetarian Association of the Canary Islands
Road 3557, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain
Prof Rodriguez has published three books in English:
- Healing from cancer through colon cleansing (1990)
- Nutrition and school success (1991)
- Il cancro e gli interessi correlati (e gli interessi che ne sono nati) (1993)
Dt Digital Cambridge Soundworks
FAQ on the abolition of animal exploitation - Walter Bond
Fonte: laverabestia.org/
Domande poste con maggiore frequenza sull'Abolizione dello sfruttamento animale, Liberazione Animale e Attivismo - di Walter Bond
Questa lista di indicazioni è ben lontana dal potersi dire completa. Potrebbe comporsi di una parte 1, parti 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. Prima o poi, comunque, le dedicherò molto probabilmente un intero capitolo nel libro che intendo pubblicare entro un paio d'anni. Tenete a mente che nessuna di queste domande è retorica. Tutte queste domande mi sono state poste, nel corso degli anni. Fate inoltre caso the brevity and incisiveness of my answers: in many of the conversations I've had on the subjects in question, the heart of the problem is in the details.
This is because, as he says 'Screaming Wolf' in the manifesto 'Declaration of War', "separate thoughts from feelings is part of the process of alienation that afflicts humanity." In fact, many people appreciate the perverse taste of carcasses of animals killed far more than they care about the free nature of those same animals. What they really want is that instances of veganism and animal liberation prove difficult to understand and therefore of little later.
So, instead of give slack to the idea of \u200b\u200bnarrow-mindedness, and wasting time with questions tediously lengthy, I have chosen to submit statements and answers. By doing this, consider morality an absolute value, refusing to play the part of those who are condescending to beg for understanding and attention. I return the ball to the sender, without too much trouble. Another important aspect is that some of these questions are answered only by those who are already familiar with instances related to animal rights. This is to be placed in direct correlation to the lack of dissemination of the material on the philosophy abolitionist and / or the strategy of the movement for animal rights. Obviously, they absolutely do not consider my answers / opinions as final. Some of those who call themselves 'abolitionists' might well consider my answers too much or too little extreme. All I can say is that these are my sincere considerations, the result of a deep love for animals, and the seriousness of the major efforts in activism, through leaflets, talks, and in some cases replacing the law of the State . If you are agree with some of my answers, feel perfectly free to use them in your turn. Otherwise, life goes on.
Animal Liberation, at any cost!
Walter Bond
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
- Perché promuovi solo il veganismo come stile alimentare?
Molte cose sono pesantemente soggettive, ma all'interno della zona grigia vi sono punti bianchi e neri. Lo sfruttamento degli animali è uno di quei punti neri. Esattamente come il razzismo è sbagliato sotto ogni aspetto, così la discriminazione operata sulla base dell'appartenenza di specie è radicalmente ingiusta. Perciò, o stai perpetrando scelte di consumo che appoggiano schiavitù, morte e sofferenza oppure non lo stai facendo, non esiste via di mezzo.
- Essere vegetariani non è forse un passo nella giusta direzione?
Ovviamente. Ad ogni modo, non è certo un punto di arrivo, bensì di partenza. E' positivo nei termini in cui rappresenta una tappa verso il veganismo, ed il veganismo è un momento di passaggio verso l'Azione Diretta.
- Ma molte persone guidano automobili e utilizzano i mezzi pubblici, queste tipologie di trasporto si appoggiano in qualche modo a prodotti di origine animale. Questo sinifica che non è possibile essere completamente vegan?
Il veganismo, come quasi tutto nella vita, non riguarda il raggiungimento della perfezione ma piuttosto consiste nel fare il massimo che ti è possibile e di conseguenza produrre il minor danno.
- Cosa faresti se ti trovassi a dover mangiare animali per sopravvivere?
Se mi trovassi su un aeroplano che si è schiantato nella frozen tundra and I was the only survivor, and an animal pass before my eyes, yes I would eat. As long as this condition is not present, Go Vegan!
- But anyone can help animals, not just vegans!
course. However, even a pedophile could save a child from a burning house. This single action will not remove a continuing trend, the exploitation and oppression.
- So for being an active Abolitionist Animal Liberation consists in being vegan?
No. Being vegan is just the first step. Abolitionist We are not opposed to animal exploitation simply in our daily consumption, but also in the reality that surrounds us.
- How do you do?
In a myriad of ways. We protest, inform, liberate animals from suffering and death and we will tirelessly to stop animal exploitation by industry and those who profit from this perversion. At any cost.
- "at all costs" seems to imply illegal or wrong?
Well, underground groups like the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), the Militia on the Rights of Animals (Animal Rights Militia) and the Department of Justice (Justice Department) operate in the so-called illegal way to stop the exploitation of animals. They are also Abolitionist.
- So to be regarded as an Abolitionist activist for animal liberation is necessary to break the law ?
No. Most of the abolitionists work well within the limits of the law, but not afraid to openly show their support for the actions of their comrades in the underground resistance.
- What other features should have an Abolitionist?
Whatever the tactics, legal or illegal, we fight and / or giving our opinion on behalf of the Total Animal Liberation. We are not interested to change the way in which animals are being used and abused. We strive to completely eliminate the use and abuse of non-human animals by humans. Furthermore, we do not we put the fake to the real value of the property value of life. An industry that requires a profit does not detract from this deadly dynamic. Sentient beings have the inherent right to live free without that man interfere. We feel also a sense of urgency that this exploitation terms here and now, not haggling endlessly a slight change in the status quo for decades to come.
- But according to what Gary Francione says, the abolitionists do not support the action illegal.
Try to imagine, as might be possible to say at the time of slavery abolitionists and blacks do not support the Underground Railroad? Would clearly be ridiculous. It must be acknowledged that not all abolitionists were part of Underground Railroad, but certainly none of them were against. Second, Gary Francione is not an abolitionist. It is definitely a promoter of veganism, but not an Abolitionist.
- Do not you think that some underground groups like the Animal Rights Militia are too extreme?
I think that anything that is made with the aim of Animal Liberation is too extremist. Also because it is a contradiction in terms. Whatever prevents the killing of animals and / or contrasting their oppressors is worthy of praise. Any action will help to realize this result was not in vain.
- But violence is not wrong anyway?
The use of force in itself and how it is used make a difference. A man who rapes a woman in a secluded valley and a good Samaritan who intervenes and strikes a blow on the head with the rapist, is an example of violence used for a greater good. In this case, to stop the rapist. Unfortunately we do not live in a perfect world and sometimes force is necessary to stop the violence. The reason why some individuals are indignant in the face of violence to save animals from the fact that, in their short-sighted mentality, the animals are somehow "Inferior", so that does not deserve to end their suffering should be used all possible means.
- thereby promoting violence?
No. Promotes Animal Liberation. Whatever the means to achieve it.
- What 's "welfare " animals?
assisenzialista The area of \u200b\u200bthe animal rights movement is composed of the most popular groups. For example, the Humane Society and many individuals like Peter Singer. In common with the abolitionists, there are many factors on which the whole animal rights movement. However, a factor totally unacceptable is the attitude of compromise with the exploiters.
- What makes a caring?
As organizations, their primary goal seems to be the accumulation of money, this premise have to expand their base of supporters. Also, are characterized by being carriers of the most ephemeral and fashionable in their particular version of the animal. This includes: puppies, kittens, organic eggs and farming, etc.. Nothing but sterile platitudes that will surely lead them to reach their goal to scrape together the funds, but does nothing to advance the real struggle for animal rights. In some ways, they are scam artists who sell something like an "animal light "to their adoring masses believe they are doing something useful. They are mostly snobs who viciously attack the real work of animal rights groups, groups of ordinary people, if you will. In fact, argue that we should continue to use animals, but more polite. Or in their words, "more human". Deceives the imagination and fuels the ignorance to say that it is possible to kill an animal "humanely." But their supporters to target these idiocies is drunk with enthusiasm. Use and exploit animals for any purpose is cruel and wrong. We can never really tell until this civilized barbarity socially approved will not stop forever.
- As an abolitionist are against pacifism?
No, not for himself. Each person has his own inclination, and apparently some of us are peaceful. We need, however, a deeper look into this issue, to begin with. Unfortunately, too often pacifism is a mask that hides the cowardice. Martin Luther King Jr. was a pacifist but he never stopped actively opposing the system. He never pulled back the face of danger, neither he nor his supporters. He did not stop until they killed him. Direct action is for ninety percent of the time non-violent, but it requires courage one hundred percent of the time.
- Ma gli incendi come tattica? È violenza.
Devo dissentire. La violenza non può essere inflitta ad un mucchio di mattoni, la proprietà può solo essere distrutta. E' questo aspetto della “violenza verso la proprietà” il dettaglio rilevante. La violenza può essere osservata solo nei confronti di un essere senziente. Creature con un interesse a rimanere libere dal dolore e dalla sofferenza. Se tiri un pugno al muro, hai esercitato “violenza” verso la tua mano, non verso il muro. Al muro non importa nulla del fatto che tu l'abbia colpito.
- Ma tu mangi le piante, anche loro sono senzienti!
No, non lo sono. Se lo fossero, porteresti a passeggio park in a carrot and not your dog. If the plants are sentient, then there would be no difference between kicking a pile of leaves and a human child. Clearly, if I really care about the plant life, go vegan and stop contributing to the exploitation of wild plant life and nature in general, the most valuable resources which will feed the "cattle". The same quantity of grain used to produce 2.5 kg of meat enough to feed a vegan for a month!
- If groups like the ALF are really doing the right thing, then why wear masks and disseminate their communiqués anonymously?
Although the actions of groups like the ALF are morally right and justifiable, their efforts are not recognized as legal by the state. Therefore, need to act anonymously.
- If you were an entrepreneur and someone destroy your property you feel?
certainly do not appreciate it. But I'm not an activist in the name of free enterprise. I am an activist for animal liberation.
- Do you really believe that animals of experiencing pain just like humans? More than
definitely feel pain. They experience terror, fear, love, etc.. The whole spectrum of emotions.
- How do you know? Why
empathize. If you do not you is clear that an animal is suffering, or lie to yourself confronted with evidence and reject the reality, or are you totally devoid of emotions and owned by a total disregard for the suffering of others.
- Do not you think that getting more people if it did not take an adversarial attitude, and so extreme?
Beyond what your attitude or position on a topic, you will always find those who agree with you and who is not. The animal liberation movement is far too full of "moderate activity". Our aim is to produce as Abolitionist real change, not to convince those who are morally blind. What happens to the animals Holocaust is a terrible and horrifying to overcome the worst nightmares. From our point of view, the answer to all this must be natural.
- Do you really think the change that is keen to see happen within the duration of your life?
not know the answer to this question. All I can say, without a shadow of a doubt that nothing will change until, as a society, we continue to accept the status quo.
- People do not have the right to eat what he wants?
No. They have the ability to eat what they want. True freedom consists not in doing what you want, but you have to. If your desires were indulged without brake, then society itself would become pure injustice.
- As a vegan where do you get all the protein and nutrients you need?
eat something vegan, and then look between five and six hours, then eat something else even vegan.
- It does not take a strong will to be vegan?
No, really, if you care anything about the animals, as we all say. You should also recognize that it is totally immoral use of their mangled bodies to suit your palate.
- So do not think that raising "free range" is a bit 'better than intensive farming?
No, it is not. This concept of "open" or "organic" is resolved, however, ultimately, with the death of the animals in order to use them. It's just a fairy tale, the idea that you can raise an animal and kill it "humanely." (I had already mentioned in a previous response)
- What about the "humane slaughter"?
That is an oxymoron. Maybe you can explain to you how to "humanely slaughtered" (kill) an animal.
- Why are you so attached to animals?
There are also a lot of people in need of help! I have no problem to help people. However, animals are exploited in a thousand times more cruel than any human group. Hence my "fixation".
- animal rights extremism is not it just another form of terrorism?
No. The animal rights activists are committed to saving innocent lives. The real terrorism is to harass and kill innocent creatures.
- vivisectors Many furriers and fear for their safety because of animal rights extremists. This is not harassing anyone and, therefore, terrorism? No.
money innocent lives cut short, they are the real terrorists. The ALF is the equivalent of National Defense for all beings. Those who torture, kill and exploit I animated humans are not the poor innocent are murderers who must be stopped.
to write a letter of support to the prisoner Write Bond Walter Bond # P01051760 PO Box 16700 Golden,
CO 80402-6700 Contact: (818) 227-5022 Animal Liberation Press Office 6320 Canoga Avenue # 1500 Woodland Hills, CA 91367
www.animalliberationpressoffice.org - press@animalliberationpressoffice.org 
Fonte: laverabestia.org/
Domande poste con maggiore frequenza sull'Abolizione dello sfruttamento animale, Liberazione Animale e Attivismo - di Walter Bond
Questa lista di indicazioni è ben lontana dal potersi dire completa. Potrebbe comporsi di una parte 1, parti 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. Prima o poi, comunque, le dedicherò molto probabilmente un intero capitolo nel libro che intendo pubblicare entro un paio d'anni. Tenete a mente che nessuna di queste domande è retorica. Tutte queste domande mi sono state poste, nel corso degli anni. Fate inoltre caso the brevity and incisiveness of my answers: in many of the conversations I've had on the subjects in question, the heart of the problem is in the details.
This is because, as he says 'Screaming Wolf' in the manifesto 'Declaration of War', "separate thoughts from feelings is part of the process of alienation that afflicts humanity." In fact, many people appreciate the perverse taste of carcasses of animals killed far more than they care about the free nature of those same animals. What they really want is that instances of veganism and animal liberation prove difficult to understand and therefore of little later.
So, instead of give slack to the idea of \u200b\u200bnarrow-mindedness, and wasting time with questions tediously lengthy, I have chosen to submit statements and answers. By doing this, consider morality an absolute value, refusing to play the part of those who are condescending to beg for understanding and attention. I return the ball to the sender, without too much trouble. Another important aspect is that some of these questions are answered only by those who are already familiar with instances related to animal rights. This is to be placed in direct correlation to the lack of dissemination of the material on the philosophy abolitionist and / or the strategy of the movement for animal rights. Obviously, they absolutely do not consider my answers / opinions as final. Some of those who call themselves 'abolitionists' might well consider my answers too much or too little extreme. All I can say is that these are my sincere considerations, the result of a deep love for animals, and the seriousness of the major efforts in activism, through leaflets, talks, and in some cases replacing the law of the State . If you are agree with some of my answers, feel perfectly free to use them in your turn. Otherwise, life goes on.
Animal Liberation, at any cost!
Walter Bond
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
- Perché promuovi solo il veganismo come stile alimentare?
Molte cose sono pesantemente soggettive, ma all'interno della zona grigia vi sono punti bianchi e neri. Lo sfruttamento degli animali è uno di quei punti neri. Esattamente come il razzismo è sbagliato sotto ogni aspetto, così la discriminazione operata sulla base dell'appartenenza di specie è radicalmente ingiusta. Perciò, o stai perpetrando scelte di consumo che appoggiano schiavitù, morte e sofferenza oppure non lo stai facendo, non esiste via di mezzo.
- Essere vegetariani non è forse un passo nella giusta direzione?
Ovviamente. Ad ogni modo, non è certo un punto di arrivo, bensì di partenza. E' positivo nei termini in cui rappresenta una tappa verso il veganismo, ed il veganismo è un momento di passaggio verso l'Azione Diretta.
- Ma molte persone guidano automobili e utilizzano i mezzi pubblici, queste tipologie di trasporto si appoggiano in qualche modo a prodotti di origine animale. Questo sinifica che non è possibile essere completamente vegan?
Il veganismo, come quasi tutto nella vita, non riguarda il raggiungimento della perfezione ma piuttosto consiste nel fare il massimo che ti è possibile e di conseguenza produrre il minor danno.
- Cosa faresti se ti trovassi a dover mangiare animali per sopravvivere?
Se mi trovassi su un aeroplano che si è schiantato nella frozen tundra and I was the only survivor, and an animal pass before my eyes, yes I would eat. As long as this condition is not present, Go Vegan!
- But anyone can help animals, not just vegans!
course. However, even a pedophile could save a child from a burning house. This single action will not remove a continuing trend, the exploitation and oppression.
- So for being an active Abolitionist Animal Liberation consists in being vegan?
No. Being vegan is just the first step. Abolitionist We are not opposed to animal exploitation simply in our daily consumption, but also in the reality that surrounds us.
- How do you do?
In a myriad of ways. We protest, inform, liberate animals from suffering and death and we will tirelessly to stop animal exploitation by industry and those who profit from this perversion. At any cost.
- "at all costs" seems to imply illegal or wrong?
Well, underground groups like the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), the Militia on the Rights of Animals (Animal Rights Militia) and the Department of Justice (Justice Department) operate in the so-called illegal way to stop the exploitation of animals. They are also Abolitionist.
- So to be regarded as an Abolitionist activist for animal liberation is necessary to break the law ?
No. Most of the abolitionists work well within the limits of the law, but not afraid to openly show their support for the actions of their comrades in the underground resistance.
- What other features should have an Abolitionist?
Whatever the tactics, legal or illegal, we fight and / or giving our opinion on behalf of the Total Animal Liberation. We are not interested to change the way in which animals are being used and abused. We strive to completely eliminate the use and abuse of non-human animals by humans. Furthermore, we do not we put the fake to the real value of the property value of life. An industry that requires a profit does not detract from this deadly dynamic. Sentient beings have the inherent right to live free without that man interfere. We feel also a sense of urgency that this exploitation terms here and now, not haggling endlessly a slight change in the status quo for decades to come.
- But according to what Gary Francione says, the abolitionists do not support the action illegal.
Try to imagine, as might be possible to say at the time of slavery abolitionists and blacks do not support the Underground Railroad? Would clearly be ridiculous. It must be acknowledged that not all abolitionists were part of Underground Railroad, but certainly none of them were against. Second, Gary Francione is not an abolitionist. It is definitely a promoter of veganism, but not an Abolitionist.
- Do not you think that some underground groups like the Animal Rights Militia are too extreme?
I think that anything that is made with the aim of Animal Liberation is too extremist. Also because it is a contradiction in terms. Whatever prevents the killing of animals and / or contrasting their oppressors is worthy of praise. Any action will help to realize this result was not in vain.
- But violence is not wrong anyway?
The use of force in itself and how it is used make a difference. A man who rapes a woman in a secluded valley and a good Samaritan who intervenes and strikes a blow on the head with the rapist, is an example of violence used for a greater good. In this case, to stop the rapist. Unfortunately we do not live in a perfect world and sometimes force is necessary to stop the violence. The reason why some individuals are indignant in the face of violence to save animals from the fact that, in their short-sighted mentality, the animals are somehow "Inferior", so that does not deserve to end their suffering should be used all possible means.
- thereby promoting violence?
No. Promotes Animal Liberation. Whatever the means to achieve it.
- What 's "welfare " animals?
assisenzialista The area of \u200b\u200bthe animal rights movement is composed of the most popular groups. For example, the Humane Society and many individuals like Peter Singer. In common with the abolitionists, there are many factors on which the whole animal rights movement. However, a factor totally unacceptable is the attitude of compromise with the exploiters.
- What makes a caring?
As organizations, their primary goal seems to be the accumulation of money, this premise have to expand their base of supporters. Also, are characterized by being carriers of the most ephemeral and fashionable in their particular version of the animal. This includes: puppies, kittens, organic eggs and farming, etc.. Nothing but sterile platitudes that will surely lead them to reach their goal to scrape together the funds, but does nothing to advance the real struggle for animal rights. In some ways, they are scam artists who sell something like an "animal light "to their adoring masses believe they are doing something useful. They are mostly snobs who viciously attack the real work of animal rights groups, groups of ordinary people, if you will. In fact, argue that we should continue to use animals, but more polite. Or in their words, "more human". Deceives the imagination and fuels the ignorance to say that it is possible to kill an animal "humanely." But their supporters to target these idiocies is drunk with enthusiasm. Use and exploit animals for any purpose is cruel and wrong. We can never really tell until this civilized barbarity socially approved will not stop forever.
- As an abolitionist are against pacifism?
No, not for himself. Each person has his own inclination, and apparently some of us are peaceful. We need, however, a deeper look into this issue, to begin with. Unfortunately, too often pacifism is a mask that hides the cowardice. Martin Luther King Jr. was a pacifist but he never stopped actively opposing the system. He never pulled back the face of danger, neither he nor his supporters. He did not stop until they killed him. Direct action is for ninety percent of the time non-violent, but it requires courage one hundred percent of the time.
- Ma gli incendi come tattica? È violenza.
Devo dissentire. La violenza non può essere inflitta ad un mucchio di mattoni, la proprietà può solo essere distrutta. E' questo aspetto della “violenza verso la proprietà” il dettaglio rilevante. La violenza può essere osservata solo nei confronti di un essere senziente. Creature con un interesse a rimanere libere dal dolore e dalla sofferenza. Se tiri un pugno al muro, hai esercitato “violenza” verso la tua mano, non verso il muro. Al muro non importa nulla del fatto che tu l'abbia colpito.
- Ma tu mangi le piante, anche loro sono senzienti!
No, non lo sono. Se lo fossero, porteresti a passeggio park in a carrot and not your dog. If the plants are sentient, then there would be no difference between kicking a pile of leaves and a human child. Clearly, if I really care about the plant life, go vegan and stop contributing to the exploitation of wild plant life and nature in general, the most valuable resources which will feed the "cattle". The same quantity of grain used to produce 2.5 kg of meat enough to feed a vegan for a month!
- If groups like the ALF are really doing the right thing, then why wear masks and disseminate their communiqués anonymously?
Although the actions of groups like the ALF are morally right and justifiable, their efforts are not recognized as legal by the state. Therefore, need to act anonymously.
- If you were an entrepreneur and someone destroy your property you feel?
certainly do not appreciate it. But I'm not an activist in the name of free enterprise. I am an activist for animal liberation.
- Do you really believe that animals of experiencing pain just like humans? More than
definitely feel pain. They experience terror, fear, love, etc.. The whole spectrum of emotions.
- How do you know? Why
empathize. If you do not you is clear that an animal is suffering, or lie to yourself confronted with evidence and reject the reality, or are you totally devoid of emotions and owned by a total disregard for the suffering of others.
- Do not you think that getting more people if it did not take an adversarial attitude, and so extreme?
Beyond what your attitude or position on a topic, you will always find those who agree with you and who is not. The animal liberation movement is far too full of "moderate activity". Our aim is to produce as Abolitionist real change, not to convince those who are morally blind. What happens to the animals Holocaust is a terrible and horrifying to overcome the worst nightmares. From our point of view, the answer to all this must be natural.
- Do you really think the change that is keen to see happen within the duration of your life?
not know the answer to this question. All I can say, without a shadow of a doubt that nothing will change until, as a society, we continue to accept the status quo.
- People do not have the right to eat what he wants?
No. They have the ability to eat what they want. True freedom consists not in doing what you want, but you have to. If your desires were indulged without brake, then society itself would become pure injustice.
- As a vegan where do you get all the protein and nutrients you need?
eat something vegan, and then look between five and six hours, then eat something else even vegan.
- It does not take a strong will to be vegan?
No, really, if you care anything about the animals, as we all say. You should also recognize that it is totally immoral use of their mangled bodies to suit your palate.
- So do not think that raising "free range" is a bit 'better than intensive farming?
No, it is not. This concept of "open" or "organic" is resolved, however, ultimately, with the death of the animals in order to use them. It's just a fairy tale, the idea that you can raise an animal and kill it "humanely." (I had already mentioned in a previous response)
- What about the "humane slaughter"?
That is an oxymoron. Maybe you can explain to you how to "humanely slaughtered" (kill) an animal.
- Why are you so attached to animals?
There are also a lot of people in need of help! I have no problem to help people. However, animals are exploited in a thousand times more cruel than any human group. Hence my "fixation".
- animal rights extremism is not it just another form of terrorism?
No. The animal rights activists are committed to saving innocent lives. The real terrorism is to harass and kill innocent creatures.
- vivisectors Many furriers and fear for their safety because of animal rights extremists. This is not harassing anyone and, therefore, terrorism? No.
money innocent lives cut short, they are the real terrorists. The ALF is the equivalent of National Defense for all beings. Those who torture, kill and exploit I animated humans are not the poor innocent are murderers who must be stopped.
Walter Bond is an animal liberation activist, abolitionist, who was arrested July 23, 2010 after being betrayed by his brother during an investigation carried out by the FBI and dall'ATF, accused of the fire company manufacturer of leather in Denver. Utah is also on trial for the burning of Tandy Leather Factory (another company of leather) and Triburon (a restaurant that serves foie gras). Working as a bricklayer in the construction of a slaughterhouse at the age of 19 years, Walter was approached to veganism and a life devoted to the fight against the culture of human exploitation and abuse toward other animals and nature. As a prisoner of war, Walter continues to stimulate and motivate other activists through his essays and his letters and the updates spread quickly through the Internet. Walter has recently accepted the role of press officer for the North American Animal Liberation (NAALPO). His philosophy and his plan of action can be summarized in these five simple words: "Animal Liberation, at any cost!"
to write a letter of support to the prisoner Write Bond Walter Bond # P01051760 PO Box 16700 Golden,
CO 80402-6700 Contact: (818) 227-5022 Animal Liberation Press Office 6320 Canoga Avenue # 1500 Woodland Hills, CA 91367
www.animalliberationpressoffice.org - press@animalliberationpressoffice.org
Opening Closed Up Ears
Il respiro consapevole - Eckhart Tolle
Discover inner space by creating intervals in the flow of thoughts. Without these intervals, your thinking becomes repetitive, uninspired, devoid of any creative spark, as it is still for the most people on the planet.
You do not need to worry about the duration of these intervals, a few seconds will do. Gradually increase alone, without any effort on your part. More important is that their length make it happen frequently, so that your daily activities and the flow of your thoughts to alternate space.
Recently someone showed me the annual program of a large spiritual organization. As I examined, I was impressed by the wide range of interesting seminars and workshops. It reminded me of a smorgasbord, one of those Scandinavian buffet where you can choose from a huge variety of foods in abundance. That person asked me if I could recommend one or two. "I do not know," I said. "These seminars will all seem very interesting. "But one thing I know for sure," I said. "Stay aware of your breathing as often as you can, whenever you remember. Do this for a year and this produce a transformation more powerful than the participation in these courses. It does not cost anything. "
Be aware of breathing shifts the focus from thinking and creates space. It is a way to generate awareness. Although the fullness of consciousness already exists in a non-manifested, we are here to bring consciousness into this dimension.
Be aware of the breath. Pay attention to the sensation of the breath. Feel the air that enters and leaves the body. Notice how the chest and abdomen expand and contract slightly with inhalation and exhalation. One conscious breath is enough to create space where before there was a succession interrupted one thought after another. One conscious breath, two or three would be even better, many times a day, is an excellent way to bring space into your life.
Even if you meditate on your breathing for two hours or more, as some have done, one breath is all you need to be aware or rather, everything that you can be aware. The rest is memory or anticipation, that thought.
Breathing is not really something you do, but something that can be observed as it happens. Breathing happens all by itself. It is the internal intelligence of the body that does. All you have to do is watch it as it happens. It does not involve any effort or tension. Be careful, also, the brief pause in breathing, especially at the point of stillness at the end of exhalation, before the beginning of a new inspiration.
In many people, the breath is unnaturally shallow. The more you are aware of the breath, the more it will regain its natural depth. For the breath itself has no form, it has been assumed since antiquity to the spirit, not the only life form. "Then the Lord God formed man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, so man became a living being."
The word breath in German, atmen, derives from the word Indian (Sanskrit) Atman, whose meaning is innate or God's divine spirit within us.
The fact that the breath has no form is one of the reasons why the awareness of the breath is an extremely effective way of bringing space into your life, to generate awareness. It is an excellent object of meditation because it is not an object, has no structure or form. The other reason is that the breath is one of the phenomena more subtle and seemingly insignificant. "The smallest thing", according to Nietzsche, creates "the greatest happiness."
Drill or less awareness of breathing as a form of meditation itself is your choice. Meditation practiced regularly, however, is not a substitute for bringing awareness of space in everyday life.
Be aware of your breathing forces you to stay in the present moment, which is the key to all inner transformation. Whenever you are aware of the breath, you are absolutely present. You also realize that you can not think, at the same time, be aware of your breathing. The breath stops the conscious mind. But far from being half asleep or in trance, you are fully awake and fully alert. You're not falling below the thought, but there was high above it. And if you look more closely you will find that these two things, to get fully in the present and stop thinking without losing consciousness, are actually one and the same thing, the emergence of consciousness in space.
- from the book "A New World" -
http://animeradianti.com/eckhart-tolle-il-respiro-consapevole/
Discover inner space by creating intervals in the flow of thoughts. Without these intervals, your thinking becomes repetitive, uninspired, devoid of any creative spark, as it is still for the most people on the planet.
You do not need to worry about the duration of these intervals, a few seconds will do. Gradually increase alone, without any effort on your part. More important is that their length make it happen frequently, so that your daily activities and the flow of your thoughts to alternate space.
Recently someone showed me the annual program of a large spiritual organization. As I examined, I was impressed by the wide range of interesting seminars and workshops. It reminded me of a smorgasbord, one of those Scandinavian buffet where you can choose from a huge variety of foods in abundance. That person asked me if I could recommend one or two. "I do not know," I said. "These seminars will all seem very interesting. "But one thing I know for sure," I said. "Stay aware of your breathing as often as you can, whenever you remember. Do this for a year and this produce a transformation more powerful than the participation in these courses. It does not cost anything. "
Be aware of breathing shifts the focus from thinking and creates space. It is a way to generate awareness. Although the fullness of consciousness already exists in a non-manifested, we are here to bring consciousness into this dimension.
Be aware of the breath. Pay attention to the sensation of the breath. Feel the air that enters and leaves the body. Notice how the chest and abdomen expand and contract slightly with inhalation and exhalation. One conscious breath is enough to create space where before there was a succession interrupted one thought after another. One conscious breath, two or three would be even better, many times a day, is an excellent way to bring space into your life.
Even if you meditate on your breathing for two hours or more, as some have done, one breath is all you need to be aware or rather, everything that you can be aware. The rest is memory or anticipation, that thought.
Breathing is not really something you do, but something that can be observed as it happens. Breathing happens all by itself. It is the internal intelligence of the body that does. All you have to do is watch it as it happens. It does not involve any effort or tension. Be careful, also, the brief pause in breathing, especially at the point of stillness at the end of exhalation, before the beginning of a new inspiration.
In many people, the breath is unnaturally shallow. The more you are aware of the breath, the more it will regain its natural depth. For the breath itself has no form, it has been assumed since antiquity to the spirit, not the only life form. "Then the Lord God formed man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, so man became a living being."
The word breath in German, atmen, derives from the word Indian (Sanskrit) Atman, whose meaning is innate or God's divine spirit within us.
The fact that the breath has no form is one of the reasons why the awareness of the breath is an extremely effective way of bringing space into your life, to generate awareness. It is an excellent object of meditation because it is not an object, has no structure or form. The other reason is that the breath is one of the phenomena more subtle and seemingly insignificant. "The smallest thing", according to Nietzsche, creates "the greatest happiness."
Drill or less awareness of breathing as a form of meditation itself is your choice. Meditation practiced regularly, however, is not a substitute for bringing awareness of space in everyday life.
Be aware of your breathing forces you to stay in the present moment, which is the key to all inner transformation. Whenever you are aware of the breath, you are absolutely present. You also realize that you can not think, at the same time, be aware of your breathing. The breath stops the conscious mind. But far from being half asleep or in trance, you are fully awake and fully alert. You're not falling below the thought, but there was high above it. And if you look more closely you will find that these two things, to get fully in the present and stop thinking without losing consciousness, are actually one and the same thing, the emergence of consciousness in space.
- from the book "A New World" -
http://animeradianti.com/eckhart-tolle-il-respiro-consapevole/
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Shoulder Painafter Pitching
ANGELS DOMESTIC
dedicated to my Domenico, who disappeared three months ago, the angel who more than anyone has been able to give me love ..
dedicated to my Domenico, who disappeared three months ago, the angel who more than anyone has been able to give me love .. WEDNESDAY 09/02/2011
There are people who still are not aware of a very important thing that Mother Earth has given us: the animals. They keep us
, absorb the energy transforming heavy for us, we become ill, suffer for us, sacrificing themselves for us.
And many of us do they do?
None.
Guardian angels not only exist in the world of spirituality, of the Beyond the Veil, but also exist in animal form and are our pets that I love the Angels call home.
My house has six cats, I have six other out and four dogs and three horses.
hear their thoughts and feel their mine.
Every morning I open my eyes and I see them next, send me lots of happiness, with them I never feel alone.
When I'm sick around me, I do not give up a second and if they are thoughtfully smiling at me or distract me ...
If each person could accommodate at least one of the loneliness would disappear from the face of the Earth.
I believe that a person who does not love animals can not even love itself, because the love for Mother Earth is ever that makes us closer to our true essence of beings of the earth.
Animals are not inferior beings, rather they are wise beings incarnated in animal form to protect ourselves.
Their respect should be mutual.
I met many people seem hard-hearted, but when they started to talk about their domestic angels I could not help but notice that light in their eyes bursting with joy!
The joy of those who really feels to be loved.
loving another being apparently weaker than us is a good exercise to open our hearts.
And what of those who wronged them?
prefer to think that there is a divine justice.
Many of our furry little animals and non- enter our homes, to absorb the energy that is stagnant and become for us.
This is not a high form of love? Wherever he goes
attracted people like me who love animals, and if you like I invite you to leave your story in this blog as a spiritual content in each animal is enclosed in a spirit wise.
Even if my guardian angels cross the threshold I know that back in another form because I have always done and I always recognized.
not grieve if you lose them because they come back, ever!
Be grateful to them, respect them because they know how to give unconditionally.
can draw from them your love, fine, superb, wonderful.
Never forget that they are a part of us, with a different form.
Give my regards to my account and embrace your angels home! Barbara
There are people who still are not aware of a very important thing that Mother Earth has given us: the animals. They keep us
, absorb the energy transforming heavy for us, we become ill, suffer for us, sacrificing themselves for us.
And many of us do they do?
None.
Guardian angels not only exist in the world of spirituality, of the Beyond the Veil, but also exist in animal form and are our pets that I love the Angels call home.
My house has six cats, I have six other out and four dogs and three horses.
hear their thoughts and feel their mine.
Every morning I open my eyes and I see them next, send me lots of happiness, with them I never feel alone.
When I'm sick around me, I do not give up a second and if they are thoughtfully smiling at me or distract me ...
If each person could accommodate at least one of the loneliness would disappear from the face of the Earth.
I believe that a person who does not love animals can not even love itself, because the love for Mother Earth is ever that makes us closer to our true essence of beings of the earth.
Animals are not inferior beings, rather they are wise beings incarnated in animal form to protect ourselves.
Their respect should be mutual.
I met many people seem hard-hearted, but when they started to talk about their domestic angels I could not help but notice that light in their eyes bursting with joy!
The joy of those who really feels to be loved.
loving another being apparently weaker than us is a good exercise to open our hearts.
And what of those who wronged them?
prefer to think that there is a divine justice.
Many of our furry little animals and non- enter our homes, to absorb the energy that is stagnant and become for us.
This is not a high form of love? Wherever he goes
attracted people like me who love animals, and if you like I invite you to leave your story in this blog as a spiritual content in each animal is enclosed in a spirit wise.
Even if my guardian angels cross the threshold I know that back in another form because I have always done and I always recognized.
not grieve if you lose them because they come back, ever!
Be grateful to them, respect them because they know how to give unconditionally.
can draw from them your love, fine, superb, wonderful.
Never forget that they are a part of us, with a different form.
Give my regards to my account and embrace your angels home! Barbara
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Se Créer Un Compte Sur Tech Deck Live
DETECTION BEYOND THE VEIL, Luis Light
Saturday, February 5, 2011
DETECTION BEYOND THE VEIL
http:// luisluce.blogspot.com/2011/02/la-rivelazione-oltre-il-velo.html
DETECTION BEYOND THE VEIL
http:// luisluce.blogspot.com/2011/02/la-rivelazione-oltre-il-velo.html
Friday, February 4, 2011
Signs Of Balding Black Men
Things have changed ...
First phase of my life: I lived freely, alternating moments of light and moments of darkness until I found my independence and resourcefulness.
I like to have fun with friends, then boyfriend curandomi absolutely not the spiritual aspect of life.
At one point in total darkness: to get out, I clung to spirituality, I experienced the healing power, I was given the honor to communicate with higher entities, and now I'm here to take stock of the situation ...
I feel unsatisfied, as if I was missing a piece to finish the puzzle, I feel that there is something that I did not return. ... So here
che do la colpa al salto vibrazionale, al fatto che l’energia è in movimento, che stiamo cambiando e che dobbiamo solo aspettare…
Ma aspettare cosa?
Nel frattempo, in nome della mia crescita, mi sono resa conto che sono diventata sempre più remissiva: “porgi l’altra guancia, l’altro è un tuo specchio, non essere aggressiva altrimenti l’energia negativa ti ritorna indietro come un boomerang, sopporta perché ciò che hai te lo sei creato, sappi aspettare, affidati ad un maestro, perdona….”
Sono tutte belle parole, ma la realtà?
Sono consapevole che noi esseri umani non siamo gli unici ad esistere, sono consapevole che ci sono forme angeliche, I am aware that there are aliens, I am aware of many things, but inside me a gnawing doubt me as a worm, "because these entities do not actually help me? Because free will is sacred and can not interfere? And most who are these entities that are channeled? "
Not all flour is a lot of" good ", there are also entities in the name of handling many people, you can recognize because they all have the same characteristics: force you to stay related to them, as if they only possessed of the secrets that you can not reveal.
Escape! Get away as you can because they are definitely "handled."
I do not care who deepen
... Everyone is free to interpret as they see fit.
When I began to understand that I alone am the creator of my destiny, that I'm tired of being suppressed and controlled by the incompetent, that I will no longer stay silent suffering in silence, I feel free!
my fate I can create just me, and I can change it at any time when I want.
The spiritual journey that I've done so far I have used to learn to understand events from a viewpoint to the higher vibrations, helped me to understand that I must not succumb to anger me, I can easily learn to assert myself, simply exposing my thought, too bad so what can happen? Nothing, because they are free and you satisfy yourself with the place of all suffering.
So I say to you that you are reading: If there is something eluding you, you create pain, if there are people who hurt you fought back! Foul
absolutely love to another by simply saying how things are and what is your point of view.
For once you shall be the mirror to others and not vice versa. Just hide behind every gesture
spirituality.
Today I see people who go to war in the name of it!
What is spirituality if not the sanctity of yourself? Who can
if you do not love yourself?
Then start now, realize your dreams, avoid the people that can damage, to show others what you are worth, stop being submissive.
Start now to be yourself! If you feel imprisoned
means that it is time that you begin to awaken, it begins to rebel, but do it with a smile, not with anger, you've been silent for too long.
If you find excuses such as: "I can not do, ruin the balance ..." then you're lying, because when you suffer means that there is balance and there is no equilibrium where the disease arrives.
If you get sick of your "enemies" will be happy because they have exercised their power over you!
Free yourself from your pain, express yourself, be yourself!
Sing, dance, laugh, cry, run naked if you want, but be yourself!
No one can stop you, only you can do. Let us stop with these stereotypes
perfect people, because the fiction leads to pain and the pain is not spiritual, as we have experienced for too long.
Now is the time to put aside everything we learned about new-age and begin to live this life with a new awareness: the love for ourselves.
Take all that deserve it, live for yourself, depending on yourself, freed from the ties worn, obsolete, breaks the chains of pain, stop trying to heal the medicine you face: the only freedom can give back health and wellness.
There are no masters, gods or other deities, there are people who enjoy manipulating other people who feel strong keeping us tied to them.
God is you! Only you are the architect of your life.
spiritual beings we are close but nothing if it can not support you, only you can take action!
I am aware that what I say to you tonight is not in line with everything I've written so far, but I have changed and believe that this change has given me the immense joy of living and especially the enthusiasm not to live passively le vicissitudini della vita e soprattutto la speranza.
Con questa nuova forma di pensiero mi sento veramente “a casa”!
Ho ritrovato me stessa.
Con immenso Amore e gratitudine,
Barbara
I like to have fun with friends, then boyfriend curandomi absolutely not the spiritual aspect of life.
At one point in total darkness: to get out, I clung to spirituality, I experienced the healing power, I was given the honor to communicate with higher entities, and now I'm here to take stock of the situation ...
I feel unsatisfied, as if I was missing a piece to finish the puzzle, I feel that there is something that I did not return. ... So here
che do la colpa al salto vibrazionale, al fatto che l’energia è in movimento, che stiamo cambiando e che dobbiamo solo aspettare…
Ma aspettare cosa?
Nel frattempo, in nome della mia crescita, mi sono resa conto che sono diventata sempre più remissiva: “porgi l’altra guancia, l’altro è un tuo specchio, non essere aggressiva altrimenti l’energia negativa ti ritorna indietro come un boomerang, sopporta perché ciò che hai te lo sei creato, sappi aspettare, affidati ad un maestro, perdona….”
Sono tutte belle parole, ma la realtà?
Sono consapevole che noi esseri umani non siamo gli unici ad esistere, sono consapevole che ci sono forme angeliche, I am aware that there are aliens, I am aware of many things, but inside me a gnawing doubt me as a worm, "because these entities do not actually help me? Because free will is sacred and can not interfere? And most who are these entities that are channeled? "
Not all flour is a lot of" good ", there are also entities in the name of handling many people, you can recognize because they all have the same characteristics: force you to stay related to them, as if they only possessed of the secrets that you can not reveal.
Escape! Get away as you can because they are definitely "handled."
I do not care who deepen
... Everyone is free to interpret as they see fit.
When I began to understand that I alone am the creator of my destiny, that I'm tired of being suppressed and controlled by the incompetent, that I will no longer stay silent suffering in silence, I feel free!
my fate I can create just me, and I can change it at any time when I want.
The spiritual journey that I've done so far I have used to learn to understand events from a viewpoint to the higher vibrations, helped me to understand that I must not succumb to anger me, I can easily learn to assert myself, simply exposing my thought, too bad so what can happen? Nothing, because they are free and you satisfy yourself with the place of all suffering.
So I say to you that you are reading: If there is something eluding you, you create pain, if there are people who hurt you fought back! Foul
absolutely love to another by simply saying how things are and what is your point of view.
For once you shall be the mirror to others and not vice versa. Just hide behind every gesture
spirituality.
Today I see people who go to war in the name of it!
What is spirituality if not the sanctity of yourself? Who can
if you do not love yourself?
Then start now, realize your dreams, avoid the people that can damage, to show others what you are worth, stop being submissive.
Start now to be yourself! If you feel imprisoned
means that it is time that you begin to awaken, it begins to rebel, but do it with a smile, not with anger, you've been silent for too long.
If you find excuses such as: "I can not do, ruin the balance ..." then you're lying, because when you suffer means that there is balance and there is no equilibrium where the disease arrives.
If you get sick of your "enemies" will be happy because they have exercised their power over you!
Free yourself from your pain, express yourself, be yourself!
Sing, dance, laugh, cry, run naked if you want, but be yourself!
No one can stop you, only you can do. Let us stop with these stereotypes
perfect people, because the fiction leads to pain and the pain is not spiritual, as we have experienced for too long.
Now is the time to put aside everything we learned about new-age and begin to live this life with a new awareness: the love for ourselves.
Take all that deserve it, live for yourself, depending on yourself, freed from the ties worn, obsolete, breaks the chains of pain, stop trying to heal the medicine you face: the only freedom can give back health and wellness.
There are no masters, gods or other deities, there are people who enjoy manipulating other people who feel strong keeping us tied to them.
God is you! Only you are the architect of your life.
spiritual beings we are close but nothing if it can not support you, only you can take action!
I am aware that what I say to you tonight is not in line with everything I've written so far, but I have changed and believe that this change has given me the immense joy of living and especially the enthusiasm not to live passively le vicissitudini della vita e soprattutto la speranza.
Con questa nuova forma di pensiero mi sento veramente “a casa”!
Ho ritrovato me stessa.
Con immenso Amore e gratitudine,
Barbara
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)